Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 4:16 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:11 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:58 pm
Posts: 3468
Location: Procyon II
As far as the AFL was concerned, Elliott = Target.
Some of these people must have thought they'd won tattslotto when we got caught.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18086
The Duke wrote:
And to think people on this site think our problems are coach based :roll: .


I know this is difficult for you to comprehend Duke but Essendon* and Melbourne suffered similar penalties to Carlton.
Did they spend 5 years at the bottom?

I'd suggest most clear thinking people would understand that our list management prior to and post the draft penalties were the biggest problem. Our list was poor by the end of 2002, the draft penalties just exascerbated the rot.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18794
Location: threeohfivethree
Look out - here come those "clear thinking people" again... :lol:

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:26 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Bill O'Reilly uses that 'clear thinking people' line a lot. 8)

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18086
GWS wrote:
Look out - here come those "clear thinking people" again... :lol:


They're a bit like rocking horse shit around here. :P

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17242
Quote:
I know this is difficult for you to comprehend Duke but Essendon* and Melbourne suffered similar penalties to Carlton.


Whoa there a minute! Similar Penalties?? No way - no one...repeat...no one has and will ever have the kind of penalties that were inflicted upon the Carlton Football Club....log on to www.matthewlloyd.com.au and www.jameshird.com.au and think about what you've said.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34572
Location: The Brown Wedge
No, I'm a 'Big Picture' person - 'Clear Thinkers' are a bunch of wankers!!

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24663
Location: Kaloyasena
The Duke wrote:
What pisses me off is that Carro Wilson said on 3AW last week end that 'many at AFL board level think the penalties were FAR to harsh and it was more about getting back at Elliott than anything' or words to that effect.

Well, derrrrrrrr Carro, I've been saying since 2002 that the only people the penalties hurt were the public and the future players and the future of the club.:



My understanding is that their are many on the AFL Commission at the time who said we got off lightly - this includes "The Spew" as well. :evil:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:41 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34572
Location: The Brown Wedge
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Quote:
I know this is difficult for you to comprehend Duke but Essendon* and Melbourne suffered similar penalties to Carlton.


Whoa there a minute! Similar Penalties?? No way - no one...repeat...no one has and will ever have the kind of penalties that were inflicted upon the Carlton Football Club....log on to www.matthewlloyd.com.au and www.jameshird.com.au and think about what you've said.


Exactly - they're vindictive slags at AFL house.

No other sports governing body would penalise the member and viewing public more than our wonderful bunch of arseholes :) .

At least the NRL team was allowed to compete on-field over the duration of the penalties and just had premiership points deducted.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:48 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24663
Location: Kaloyasena
Don't forget that Ron Evans was the President of Essendon* when their breaches occurred but because he was Chairman of the AFL at the time they made the then Essendon* President David Shaw take the rap, whatever happened their was a lot of "fluidity" about the actual timing of Essendon*'s breaches and their can be no doubt that Evans was President during the AFL sanctioned amnesty period when nearly ALL clubs were guilty of salary cap breaches.

Ron Evans was therefore - the acused and his own jury and executioner. The Wet Lettuce Leaf Industry in Australia went into meltdown. :roll:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18086
Melbourne.

Penalised their first pick in the 1999 draft which was given to Fremantle.
Penalised their first 3 picks in the 2000 draft.
Fine $ 350,000 plus another $250,000 suspended.

http://www.realfooty.theage.com.au/arti ... 44714.html

Essendon*.

Penalised their first 2 picks in the 1999 draft.
First pick was pick 45.

http://www.realfooty.theage.com.au/arti ... 44714.html

Carlton.

2002. First pick utilised pick 17
Next pick 45 (Kade Simpson)

2003. First pick utilised Andrew Walker (Pick 2)
Next pick No.35 (swapped for Heath Scotland)

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:04 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I think it is important to note that the 2nd and 3rd round penalties in the 2002ND were suspended from breaches found out in 2000 (incurred 1998 to 1999).

So we lost Pick 1 and 2 in the 2002ND because of the 'Black Friday' breaches, with Pick 2 corresponding to our first round pick.

Thereafter, the penalties relate to the suspension. Our second round pick should have been lost but wasn't due to the French trade; our third round pick was lost. Simpson was the first 4th round pick; our first.

In the same vein, about $57k of the $930k in fines was suspended from the earlier breach.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18086
Exactly Molsey.
Our penalties issued in 2002 were very similar to Melbournes however our monetary penalty was greater due to persistent cheating.
It's the carry over from suspended penalties which made it worse.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:39 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:29 am
Posts: 2209
AGRO wrote:
Don't forget that Ron Evans was the President of Essendon* when their breaches occurred but because he was Chairman of the AFL at the time they made the then Essendon* President David Shaw take the rap, whatever happened their was a lot of "fluidity" about the actual timing of Essendon*'s breaches and their can be no doubt that Evans was President during the AFL sanctioned amnesty period when nearly ALL clubs were guilty of salary cap breaches.

Ron Evans was therefore - the acused and his own jury and executioner. The Wet Lettuce Leaf Industry in Australia went into meltdown. :roll:


his son is/was also big wig at JB Were. James Hird put in some very long hours as a stock broker to earn his salary while somehow playing full time footy.

_________________
I support Carlton, Fulham and I'm an accountant - my mate calls me a 3 time loser.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:31 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I've put the work into a Blueseum article for anyone who is interested:

http://www.blueseum.org/cfc/tiki-read_a ... ticleId=19

Happy to take comments / criticism publicly or via PM,

M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 12:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18086
Well done Molsey.
Puts straight a few misconceptions.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:04 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:15 am
Posts: 1196
Location: Terra Australis
Thanks Molsey. The thought of it all still makes me feel physically sick.

_________________
Ich bein ein Carltonian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:11 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
Kudos for doing it Mols, but I just don't want to look. Just yet.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:16 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I fully understand WBY - its not pleasant reading. To have $1m and 6 picks ripped away from you (with one sort of 'given' back) - right when the Club needed to rebuild - is painful reading. But I've tried to do it in a factual, even way, and in my mind, when you do it that way, we deserved the whole kit & kaboodle thrown at us.

Ultimately though that wasn't the intent - we will argue whether it was too severe until we can no longer remember the penalties. the intent is to put the background and outline of the story in a single spot as a reference point - who knows, maybe that will sustain the argument even longer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34572
Location: The Brown Wedge
I agree Molsey. We did the crime blah, blah, blah.

My issue is that the penalties the AFL had in place meant nothing to Jack - he was a law unto himself.

There should have been a means to remove boards and Presidents who oversaw more than one salary cap offence.

There was no personal fine, no jail terms for indescretions, just punishment of players, staff, supporters and future players. I think they're the ones who should have been protected.

What if Jack had stayed on as President and did it AGAIN? $10M fine and no draft picks for 4 years?

The AFL should have seen the writing on the wall and done something about the penalties.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group