Synbad wrote:
Effes wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
I was under the impression that the Board didn't see a full copy of the report, that the AFL gave Malouf the 'highlights', which he presented to the Board. There was definitely an article in the paper at the time which said that Malouf presented the Board with the highlights of the report.
So...either that was all he was given, or...he got a full copy, and only presented certain parts (not surprising, if the rumours that it was scathing of his performance are true) to the Board.
Does anyone know more of this?
I thought the AFL gave Malouf the full report and then he selected which bits would be shown to the rest of the board
The president was privy to it.. as too was the CEO..
Well, if that's the case, then that is a joke. The report (supposedly) slams the CEO and the President, and they are the only two people to see it? What are they going to do, publicise the whole thing to the rest of the Board/members so that everyone else can see that they have been assessed as incompetent? So Malouf presents selected elements, and conveniently leaves out the rest of the damning content.
Where is the accountability here?
I agree with others, if it is decided that it is best to get this public, Caro is the man...so to speak. Or maybe Jim Wilson, but he has been suspiciously quiet of late, I'm wondering if he might have some involvement in a challenge.
On the flip side, if there is a challenge brewing, surely they would have considered all this?
Aaaargh!! I am so frustrated!!