Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:22 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 182 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:14 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Blue Vain wrote:
They may well be excellent candidates.
But surely the honourable option would be to call an AGM and run these guys as candidates. :?

We currently have a board of 12 people with only 50% elected by the members! The rest are political appointments.
How is that healthy? Instead of our board meetings being utilised to important address club issues, they are being hijacked by the incumbents shoring up their own positions.

As far as I'm concerned, anyone who aligns themself with Smorgon should be treated as such.
If he goes, they can flower of as well.


Totally agree!!!.... inside 12 months since Smorgon has taken over we have a heap of appointees like the Elliot days....

The opnly one of those wortyh his salt is Richard Newton... the others are head nodders and glory seekers....

Spill the board and call for an election all seats open!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:16 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:19 pm
Posts: 1105
Well I've got one vote. Thanks mate. :wink:

Anyone want to second it?

Come on, I know a bit about footy, I love the Blues and once ran a newspaper delivery business (when I was in Grade 6).

I reckon I could make a fist of it. Better than that current Bozzo with the dorky glasses who doesn't know how to crack a smile.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:17 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
So just remind me again why these new four are going to be absolutely woeful contributors, while we await our saviour, apparently that great communicator Colin De Lutis? Is it possible that these new directors have smarts and money? Is it possible that they may have ideas? Or do you have to be an anonymous mystery man poised to bucket in $8m to have any cred? If the alternative is Colin De Lutis (or that appears to have been yesterdays rumour) what has he got that these new four don't (apart for a track record as a director on the board that created this mess)? If there is some better alternative, then out your heads over the parapet. But it needs to be better, not just different. The main thing we need is $8m and if ODN is right about Donald Duck being the man, I'll vote for him. So Donald, show yourself and the money.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:19 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 10:19 pm
Posts: 1105
The first thing I will do as President is sack Denis Pagan. He's lousy, it's as clear as day.

The second thing I will do as President is bring back the Bluebirds. That'll increase membership among the notoriously stingy older male demographic. :lol:

The third thing I'll do as Pres is make the sausage sizzle guy cook bratwurst sausages, and not them crappy snags they currently cook.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
gerry atric wrote:
So just remind me again why these new four are going to be absolutely woeful contributors, while we await our saviour, apparently that great communicator Colin De Lutis? Is it possible that these new directors have smarts and money? Is it possible that they may have ideas? Or do you have to be an anonymous mystery man poised to bucket in $8m to have any cred? If the alternative is Colin De Lutis (or that appears to have been yesterdays rumour) what has he got that these new four don't (apart for a track record as a director on the board that created this mess)? If there is some better alternative, then out your heads over the parapet. But it needs to be better, not just different. The main thing we need is $8m and if ODN is right about Donald Duck being the man, I'll vote for him. So Donald, show yourself and the money.


Donald will come with money... powerful allies and a game plan that has been received by the AFL and the NAB... they have actually seen something in print by someone from Carlton (even if its unofficially Carlton).. which is more than the AFL and the NAB.. (THE ENTITIES KEEPING US ALIVE)....have seen from the current group....(NOTHING)

Mickey has been sitting around for a few years doing sweet FA.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:21 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Bluebernz wrote:
The Old Dark Navy's wrote:
I'd vote for Donald Duck as president if he erased the debt and if he was incompetent, call for an EGM and offload him after a year.


Sadly, I wholeheartedly agree. I dont care who comes in as long as they bring with them significant funds!!

We need the cash as desperately as a drowning man needs air.... and we're sinking fast!! :cry: :cry: :cry:

I don't wanna end up like Fitzroy!

...we ARE in massive financial debt!

...our membership HAS been declining!

...we ARE like Fitzroy!!!

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:21 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24655
Location: Kaloyasena
Speakers wrote:
The second thing I will do as President is bring back the Bluebirds. That'll increase membership among the notoriously stingy older male demographic. :lol:



It was a visionary concept when George Harris introduced them in 1978. :wink:


You'll get no argument from me, I liked them. :wink: :oops:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:23 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Apart from that.. the four should have to get in by election just as Lee did..

who are they that need to be invited on 3 months prior to an election AGM???

Is it because theyre offering us a million dollars each??
Household names???

What is it about them ???

Joke.... !!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:23 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:12 pm
Posts: 1291
Location: Sydney
speakers it doesn't sound like you've got any dosh.... I'm off the bandwagon :P


VOTE 1 DONALD DUCK!!

SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!

:-D

_________________
When Dick became President, it was as if everyone at Carlton came out of the hailstorm and into the sunshine - Stephen Kernahan

YARRAN!!





.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:26 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:12 pm
Posts: 1291
Location: Sydney
budzy wrote:
Bluebernz wrote:
The Old Dark Navy's wrote:
I'd vote for Donald Duck as president if he erased the debt and if he was incompetent, call for an EGM and offload him after a year.


Sadly, I wholeheartedly agree. I dont care who comes in as long as they bring with them significant funds!!

We need the cash as desperately as a drowning man needs air.... and we're sinking fast!! :cry: :cry: :cry:

I don't wanna end up like Fitzroy!

...we ARE in massive financial debt!

...our membership HAS been declining!

...we ARE like Fitzroy!!!


yeah I know! :cry: :cry: :cry:

but at least we're not DEAD.... yet!!

_________________
When Dick became President, it was as if everyone at Carlton came out of the hailstorm and into the sunshine - Stephen Kernahan

YARRAN!!





.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:31 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2773
Have met 3 of the 4 before. My v basic impression:
MH - excellent football/sport knowledge, good networker, big carlton fan, bit of an ego.
ZF - genuine bloke, extremely generous with time & money + hard worker. not sure about his football knowledge.
SM - compulsive networker, get feeling he has his own agenda (which may or may not incidentally benefit CFC) - I am not convinced.

As I am new, I will declare my position: I am not pushing any barrow. We have become St Kilda. St Kilda are becoming what we used to be. I want a united board with the united & simple goal of getting this club back to the top on & off the field. I don't want a board made up of bits and pieces put together to shore up positions - that's how we ended up where we are after a motley crew was hastily put together to overthrow Elliot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18066
gerry atric wrote:
So just remind me again why these new four are going to be absolutely woeful contributors, while we await our saviour, apparently that great communicator Colin De Lutis? Is it possible that these new directors have smarts and money? Is it possible that they may have ideas?


All very true.
But why dont we call an AGM and let the members decide?
New ideas are fantastic but democracy doesnt have to be thrown out to achieve it.
Perhaps if Smorgon concentrated on real issues instead of saving his arse, we would have an idea of when an AGM is due.

5 days before christmas and we dont even know a date! :?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18066
http://carltonfc.com.au/default.asp?pg= ... eid=310755

Chocolate topping with sprinkles on top.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:02 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17236
Quote:
...we ARE like Fitzroy!!!


No - we are nothing like Fitzroy. Two good mates of mine played for the Lions - one from 1990-1994; the other from 1993 to its demise. From 1990 - 1996, the club went through various stages of not being able to pay their players. The club did not have a home. They were forced to do pre-season training in Bulleen and host practice matches at Skippers Reserve. There are clubs running around in the ammo's today that were better off financially than Fitzroy. Their problems were part historical and geographical being wedged in between the power clubs of Carlton and Collingwood. Their membership was never strong and the move to Brisbane should have happened in 1986 - instead they and their supporters had to endure failed mergers and numerous assasination attempts by the AFL before they 'merged' (debate for another area).

This hasn't and won't happen at Carlton. We are still wondering where the white knight will come from as everyone is aware that they are out there. But if you haven't realised it yet - you never will. They won't invest in Carlton while Graham Smorgon is there. The money is there - the plan is there, but the trust in the current administration is not.

The impetus is on YOU, the member to realise that your membership is more than just a seat at the Dome or the 'G. It's your voice and you should use it to full effect.

If you're not sure how to use it - it's probably because you don't know where to get the facts - I agree, it's hard. But based purely on the fact that those who have money are not willing to assist in the hour of need due to who's in charge - wouldn't you want to open up the possibility of a Pratt, Mitchell and Grollo signing a cheque or two ?

After all; I'm not sure Kate Ceberano or Vanessa Amorossi (Ralph Carr's only 2 clients) are going to have hit singles in America come 2007.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:17 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
I dont know how you can keep adding board members without the general membership having a vote....I know little of these people or who they are aligned with or what their aims are.
We need a total cleanout and I mean total cleanout so there are no factions or aligned directors....I listened to Tom Elliott on SEN and was impressed with the way he spoke, but he is just another White Knight with a bag full of promises.
There are that many white knights, challengers, wannabes...I dont have a clue what their plans or aims are and how any ordinary member could make a educated vote is beyond me....I wont be voting for any white knights until I have all the facts.....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:23 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2773
Can't we get all the board member wannabes to make powerpoint presentations to us before we vote???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:24 pm 
Offline
formerly blue-insider
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 11:36 am
Posts: 292
Location: Caaaaaarlton
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Quote:
...we ARE like Fitzroy!!!


No - we are nothing like Fitzroy. Two good mates of mine played for the Lions - one from 1990-1994; the other from 1993 to its demise. From 1990 - 1996, the club went through various stages of not being able to pay their players. The club did not have a home. They were forced to do pre-season training in Bulleen and host practice matches at Skippers Reserve. There are clubs running around in the ammo's today that were better off financially than Fitzroy. Their problems were part historical and geographical being wedged in between the power clubs of Carlton and Collingwood. Their membership was never strong and the move to Brisbane should have happened in 1986 - instead they and their supporters had to endure failed mergers and numerous assasination attempts by the AFL before they 'merged' (debate for another area).

This hasn't and won't happen at Carlton. We are still wondering where the white knight will come from as everyone is aware that they are out there. But if you haven't realised it yet - you never will. They won't invest in Carlton while Graham Smorgon is there. The money is there - the plan is there, but the trust in the current administration is not.

The impetus is on YOU, the member to realise that your membership is more than just a seat at the Dome or the 'G. It's your voice and you should use it to full effect.

If you're not sure how to use it - it's probably because you don't know where to get the facts - I agree, it's hard. But based purely on the fact that those who have money are not willing to assist in the hour of need due to who's in charge - wouldn't you want to open up the possibility of a Pratt, Mitchell and Grollo signing a cheque or two ?

After all; I'm not sure Kate Ceberano or Vanessa Amorossi (Ralph Carr's only 2 clients) are going to have hit singles in America come 2007.


Can't believe you took the bait :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:29 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
We are still wondering where the white knight will come from as everyone is aware that they are out there. But if you haven't realised it yet - you never will. They won't invest in Carlton while Graham Smorgon is there. The money is there - the plan is there, but the trust in the current administration is not.

The impetus is on YOU, the member to realise that your membership is more than just a seat at the Dome or the 'G. It's your voice and you should use it to full effect.

If you're not sure how to use it - it's probably because you don't know where to get the facts - I agree, it's hard. But based purely on the fact that those who have money are not willing to assist in the hour of need due to who's in charge - wouldn't you want to open up the possibility of a Pratt, Mitchell and Grollo signing a cheque or two ?

.


Thats all well and good but lets wait to see who is willing to publicly committ. This is a riduculous situation. Smorgon adding new unelected faces to the board 3 months before an AGM when a challenge is on the cards. Yet the challengers are happy to play Chinese whispers and expect that everyone will jump aboard without any names or platform being put forward.

I'm sure it will come out before the AGM. Just don't expect people to commit to a group that has no names or policy

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:32 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
<ralphcarr>


God help us.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21623
Location: North of the border
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
I dont know how you can keep adding board members without the general membership having a vote....I know little of these people or who they are aligned with or what their aims are.
We need a total cleanout and I mean total cleanout so there are no factions or aligned directors....I listened to Tom Elliott on SEN and was impressed with the way he spoke, but he is just another White Knight with a bag full of promises.
There are that many white knights, challengers, wannabes...I don't have a clue what their plans or aims are and how any ordinary member could make a educated vote is beyond me....I wont be voting for any white knights until I have all the facts.....



5 years ago when the club was in turmoil they searched high and low for their White Knight . The best they could come up with was Ian Collins who had another agenda to move the club to help pay off the AFL debt at Telstra Dome.

Now Five years down the track we are seeing names pop up all over the place any one who has worn a Navy blue suit in the past has his named linked to Carlton as either a potential savour or running for the Board

Why?? ask yourself Why . Why would anyone want to be associated with what is perceived to be a Basket case with no hope . Why would the high fliers of business want their name linked to the Carlton Football club.

Why - Because the club has been through the worst - They have now 6-12 of the best up and coming players in their side . The only way for Carlton to go from here is up. Captains of business like to be associated with winners everyone of these names being thrown up wants to be known as The Man the one who took the team from its lowest point and took them back to the top.

Smorgan keeps saying it is on field success that will turn this club around. Matheson has publicly stated they are doing the best they can considering their finances .

This is why Smorgan is shoring up his position . this is why so many names are being thrown up.

There is no White Knight . The White Knight is on field success and the person who is in charge when the on field success occurs will be perceived as The White Knight

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 182 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group