Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 11:40 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19609
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Mordan wrote:
blue-insider wrote:
phoenix johnson wrote:
Stupid move.


Based on what?

break even no.s at PP is 18,000
telstra done 30,000
mcg 22,000

stupid people post stupid comments.

low drawing crowds back at PP eg Port Adel / Freo / Gee.
and the rest at mcg.

make sense financially.
makes sense as home ground intimidation advantage

you got any other revelations you'd like to share?


Makes sense financially? Care to explain how you can generate enough money from 4 games a year to fund maintenance of a ground to AFL standards?

Then explain who is going to put in the capital to get the ground back up to AFL standards to begin with.

Then explain where we'll get the $10m to fund the elite training facility once we lose our council and government funding.

Then, maybe start calling people stupid.


Also the fact that as BW said, the AFL determine where we play


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:13 pm
Posts: 1830
Location: Fitzroy
The Melbourne City Council are only tipping in funding for the redevelopment if we no longer play games there. Plus we are at the mercy of where the AFL decides to schedule our games. I can't really see it happening.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:01 pm 
Offline
formerly blue-insider
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 11:36 am
Posts: 292
Location: Caaaaaarlton
Mordan wrote:
blue-insider wrote:
phoenix johnson wrote:
Stupid move.


Based on what?

break even no.s at PP is 18,000
telstra done 30,000
mcg 22,000

stupid people post stupid comments.

low drawing crowds back at PP eg Port Adel / Freo / Gee.
and the rest at mcg.

make sense financially.
makes sense as home ground intimidation advantage

you got any other revelations you'd like to share?


Makes sense financially? Care to explain how you can generate enough money from 4 games a year to fund maintenance of a ground to AFL standards?

Then explain who is going to put in the capital to get the ground back up to AFL standards to begin with.

Then explain where we'll get the $10m to fund the elite training facility once we lose our council and government funding.

Then, maybe start calling people stupid.


Keep posting blindly pal. Why don't you simply ring the club and ask them about their leasing agreement - one you are obviously unaware of.

Then take a walk down to the ground and have a look at the surface.
That should answer your next one.

And finally, the redevelopments proposed at the moment are just that.
Please, whatever you do, don't breed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:04 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
Ah, good to see the genius of the insider back on track!

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:09 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
blue-insider wrote:
Mordan wrote:
blue-insider wrote:
phoenix johnson wrote:
Stupid move.


Based on what?

break even no.s at PP is 18,000
telstra done 30,000
mcg 22,000

stupid people post stupid comments.

low drawing crowds back at PP eg Port Adel / Freo / Gee.
and the rest at mcg.

make sense financially.
makes sense as home ground intimidation advantage

you got any other revelations you'd like to share?


Makes sense financially? Care to explain how you can generate enough money from 4 games a year to fund maintenance of a ground to AFL standards?

Then explain who is going to put in the capital to get the ground back up to AFL standards to begin with.

Then explain where we'll get the $10m to fund the elite training facility once we lose our council and government funding.

Then, maybe start calling people stupid.


Keep posting blindly pal. Why don't you simply ring the club and ask them about their leasing agreement - one you are obviously unaware of.

Then take a walk down to the ground and have a look at the surface.
That should answer your next one.

And finally, the redevelopments proposed at the moment are just that.
Please, whatever you do, don't breed.


Are you serious, mate?

Mordan just produced a few facts as to why we wouldn't/shouldn't be going back to PP and all you can do is come up with petty insults and a comment regarding the quality of the surface down there.

Making yourself to look quite the fool.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:10 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:55 pm
Posts: 776
Location: UK
blue-insider wrote:
Mordan wrote:
Makes sense financially? Care to explain how you can generate enough money from 4 games a year to fund maintenance of a ground to AFL standards?

Then explain who is going to put in the capital to get the ground back up to AFL standards to begin with.

Then explain where we'll get the $10m to fund the elite training facility once we lose our council and government funding.

Then, maybe start calling people stupid.


Keep posting blindly pal. Why don't you simply ring the club and ask them about their leasing agreement - one you are obviously unaware of.

Then take a walk down to the ground and have a look at the surface.
That should answer your next one.

And finally, the redevelopments proposed at the moment are just that.
Please, whatever you do, don't breed.


You didn't answer any of my questions.

I have no idea what the leasing agreement has to do with generating enough revenue from only 4 games a year. Please fill me in.

Secondly, there is much, much more to the maintenance than the state of the playing surface. It's the best in Victoria, pity the stands aren't.

Finally, you do realise that we lose the money from the council and the government for the redevelopment if AFL games are scheduled at the ground? So before questioning the quality of my genetic material, make sure you're at least a little informed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:29 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Quote:
Based on what?

break even no.s at PP is 18,000
telstra done 30,000
mcg 22,000

stupid people post stupid comments.

low drawing crowds back at PP eg Port Adel / Freo / Gee.
and the rest at mcg.

make sense financially.
makes sense as home ground intimidation advantage

you got any other revelations you'd like to share?


Geez, you are an agressive chap blues-insider.
What really matters is who these 18,000 are. If they are Carlton members then they have paid for entry already, and you could play the game on the moon and have none of them turn up and we would still make the same at the turnstiles. The additional revenue at each individual game is generated by people who are paying at the gate, not members.

We got ourslves into trouble by thinking like a VFL club and not an AFL club. PP, great as my memories of it are, is yesterday's venue, we barely get half our members there for interstate games never mind non members, and we need badly to expand our supporter base across Melbourne among young kids who have no misty eyed memories of 6 games on a Saturday at local grounds. Essendon* and C'wood have left us behind over the last 15 years. Lets not pretend it is 1981.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:44 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
No more games at MC Labour Park. Those days are gone!

If anything, we should play 1 or 2 home games interstate (Adelaide Oval & SCG.) :P

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
blue-insider wrote:
phoenix johnson wrote:
Stupid move.


Based on what?

break even no.s at PP is 18,000
telstra done 30,000
mcg 22,000

stupid people post stupid comments.

low drawing crowds back at PP eg Port Adel / Freo / Gee.
and the rest at mcg.

make sense financially.
makes sense as home ground intimidation advantage

you got any other revelations you'd like to share?


No can you show us where those figures come from???

Ill take you seriously when you can explain them.... :lol:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:10 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:47 am
Posts: 1162
Personally I don't think we should go back to Princess Park. However it is important to note that Carlton and Pratt would probably have legal grounds to get rid of the TD contract if they wanted to move back to PP, due to Collins' conflict of interest at the time the agreement was made.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:37 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Barack Obama wrote:
Personally I don't think we should go back to Princess Park. However it is important to note that Carlton and Pratt would probably have legal grounds to get rid of the TD contract if they wanted to move back to PP, due to Collins' conflict of interest at the time the agreement was made.


But where would we play if the AFL dont schedule us on PP????

What people dont understand is we have no right when it comes to home grounds.. the jimpers... the name.. the game schedules and everything else belongs to the AFL....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:15 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:28 pm
Posts: 2220
As much as I love the past and Princes Park, these memories cannot be a part of our future.

There has to be a new future with a new venue, most probably Telstra Dome.

Attempts to re visit the past, such as playing games at Princes Park will only serve to hinder the development and relaunching of Carlton.

Actually, I agree that the playing surface of Princes Park is probably the best in the league, but as important as this is, there is more to hosting a football match than just the playing surfase of the ground.

_________________
My Blue Heaven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:29 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
some people in here are hoping we reach the dizzy heights of 18,000 spectators......

And i wanna know where this 18k comes from??

Youd think with 30k odd members... noone is a walk up to the gate payer to watch footy anymore... except the opposition supporters...

I think some people are REALLY living in the past.........
....and really have no idea where the game is at right now....


Lance?????

Princes Park and 18k break even??????

Give me a break...... its all moved forwards kiddies... its no longer the seventies...
Its about TV and corporates.. and millions and millions of dollars.

BUT!!!!.. you can always get down to Kramer street and watch the Bullies if you need an itch scratched!!!...

Slow and short key position players.. and a suburban footy ground .. youre even allowed to run onto the ground at the end of the game...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:09 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 10:45 pm
Posts: 423
blue-insider wrote:
phoenix johnson wrote:
Stupid move.


Based on what?

break even no.s at PP is 18,000
telstra done 30,000
mcg 22,000

stupid people post stupid comments.

low drawing crowds back at PP eg Port Adel / Freo / Gee.
and the rest at mcg.

make sense financially.
makes sense as home ground intimidation advantage

you got any other revelations you'd like to share?


worst post ever


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:48 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
Pratt would not want to sit in the crappy little boxes at Princess Park when he can sit in 5 STAR comfort at the DOME.

A move back to PP will never happen. Unless the AFL, Melbourne City Council and State Government believe it is the solution for the A-League, Melbourne Storm and then money outside the club is thrown at PP to include lights, better corporate facilities, better supporter facilities and remove all the old splinter seats.

This won't happen as these parties are better off building a new stadium.

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:21 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10656
Clayman wrote:
Pratt would not want to sit in the crappy little boxes at Princess Park when he can sit in 5 STAR comfort at the DOME.

A move back to PP will never happen. Unless the AFL, Melbourne City Council and State Government believe it is the solution for the A-League, Melbourne Storm and then money outside the club is thrown at PP to include lights, better corporate facilities, better supporter facilities and remove all the old splinter seats.

This won't happen as these parties are better off building a new stadium.


The AFL needs another "smaller/more profitable" stadium in Victoria. It needs to play all matches between Victorian teams vs Interstate teams like Fremantle/Port/West Coast at least at this venue.
Therefore there is no reason why all parties mentioned above couldn't get together and re-build PP as this stadium. The positives outway the negatives and by a long shot. The only reason the other clubs "refuse" to play games there is because it's CFC's ground but as people say the AFL control scheduling and if they can show all teams the $$$$ value advantage then we have a winner. Except ofcourse if there is too much vested interest to keep TD/MCG running at loses for these games.

PS. Most Victorian teams would play their "home" games here instead of Tassie for instance. :idea:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:28 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:25 pm
Posts: 73
When was the last time anyone saw PP sold out.
The most I have seen is 25K
When we are back in winnign form we will fill TD.
How many Carlton supporters wont go to the footy knowing that we are going to smash an interstate team, for the last 3 years it has been the other way around.
My 2c


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:41 pm 
Offline
formerly blue-insider
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 11:36 am
Posts: 292
Location: Caaaaaarlton
SurreyBlue wrote:
The AFL needs another "smaller/more profitable" stadium in Victoria. It needs to play all matches between Victorian teams vs Interstate teams like Fremantle/Port/West Coast at least at this venue.
Therefore there is no reason why all parties mentioned above couldn't get together and re-build PP as this stadium. The positives outway the negatives and by a long shot. The only reason the other clubs "refuse" to play games there is because it's CFC's ground but as people say the AFL control scheduling and if they can show all teams the $$$$ value advantage then we have a winner. Except ofcourse if there is too much vested interest to keep TD/MCG running at loses for these games.

PS. Most Victorian teams would play their "home" games here instead of Tassie for instance. :idea:


Surrey - It's refreshing to read a post based on fact and understanding - unlike the crap posted on the first two pages.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:01 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 6154
J-Top wrote:
When was the last time anyone saw PP sold out.
The most I have seen is 25K
When we are back in winnign form we will fill TD.
How many Carlton supporters wont go to the footy knowing that we are going to smash an interstate team, for the last 3 years it has been the other way around.
My 2c


Especially when there aren't even enough toilets to service those attending.

We have to move on. I'm still partial to the MCG but we appear locked into the Docklands and if we have to win premeierships 17,18,19 in rapid succession there then I'll let my arm be twisted.

It's about winning now. When the Blues are firing we'll all be happy to give the world grief from Docklands.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 8:11 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:55 pm
Posts: 776
Location: UK
blue-insider wrote:
Surrey - It's refreshing to read a post based on fact and understanding - unlike the crap posted on the first two pages.


If it's such rubbish then it should be easy to correct us. Here's where you can start.

Explain how we can generate enough revenue from 4 games a year to fund a whole stadium. Keep in mind that maintenance on the stands to allow hosting of games is much higher than just as a training venue.

You might also want to fill us in on where the money to get the stands back up to a usable level might come from.

Then explain to us how we're going to fund our stage 1 redevelopment without council and government assistance. The money from the government is only available to training facilities. If we play even 1 game a year there, then no money from the government.

Rather than just throwing accusations of ignorance at people, how about you fill us all in blue-insider?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: choo, Google [Bot] and 66 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group