Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jul 10, 2025 7:49 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 144 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 8:50 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
CarltonClem wrote:
Some of you should be ashamed of yourselves. If were a kid out there playing AFL without much support, I reckon you'd be defecating in your pants. Simpson has shown that he has the tools, not like other players who've shown they haven't.

Young players are known to be inconsistent, even Judd has bad games. Walker hasn't had 26 possessions since his debut, let's get rid of him.

Let's get rid of players who are new to the team, haven't played with the others for a length of time, don't know their teammates that well yet, lack the body size for AFL at this stage.

Those of you who work, I bet you made mistakes in your first month on the job. Maybe your boss should have sacked you then. :roll: He/She didn't. Why? Because they had belief in you and felt you were learning. Why don't you just bloody shut up and give them some time? If they have the tools, give them time. Some players don't have the tools, that's a different story.

Richmond supporters :roll:


Wot 'e said

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 9:31 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Again, i'm not sold on Kade yet! Key word there is YET! I'm willing to give him time. What's he had? 8 senior games? Keep him going. But don't dare drop him back to the magoo's.
Blokes like Prenda, Clarke and Wiggens though who have all played over 50 games..................YUP! There gone in my eyes!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 9:48 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 3844
Location: Canberra Town!
Quote:
What are you all on?

All you simmo fans wanted Pagan to give him a go.

Well, he got his go, and I think we've seen enough. He ain't got it.

No size, no ability, doesn't win the ball. He'll be dropped next week for the only other other guy on the same crappy level as him - number 7.

In fact, simmo makes Davies look like a Brownlow medallist.

For fun, my brother and I counted the amount of times he got in the TV screen - it was 10 times in a half for no touches (AND we've got a widescreen TV!).

To everone on this site who reckons this guy has potential, you are F@%&#! dreaming.

OFF TO THE BULLANTS AND ON TO OBSCURITY SIMMO


:roll: :roll: :roll:
havent read the rest of this thread yet, but posts like these really make me wonder about some of our supporters.

so his 12th carrer game was a bad one. @#$%&! me.
what are your thoughts on heath scotland ? because for the record simmos 1 possie was 1 more than heath on sunday.

yes he is small, but we knew that when we got him, and this was the main reason he lasted all the way to pick 45 which was out first pick that year mind you. he has PLEANTY of ability and if you haven't been able to see that in his better games this year then you probably never will.

for gods sake people give the kids a decent chance before condeming them to hell.

one of the few players on our list with genuine pace and skill, sure he will make mistakes and have consistency problems but this is the case for most players with 30 or less games.

and very big garthp: to this above quote.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 9:52 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
dannyboy, CC and Deano.

Whats the point in keeping them if they're not all getting 45 effective possessions each week? :roll: you guys just don't expect enough of the boys. How will they ever improve if we don't demand this as a minimum from them each and every week.

You have to keep in mind that we know a lot more than Denis. We may not have coached 2 premierships and had a team to the prelim final every year for 8 years running, taking it from a 120 point loss to the most consistent team in the AFL, but we still know more than Denis.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 9:54 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Two years ago ... Barny = Dud..(I know he wasnt a kid but anyway....
Last year it was Livo=Dud
A month ago Davies = Dud
Yeah last week it was Walker=Dud... :roll:

The kids you have to PERSEVERE with!!! :twisted: :evil:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 10:08 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:01 pm
Posts: 1030
Can I just run a refresher past some of Simmo baggers? Drafted at the end of 2002 at number 45, our first pick in the first year of the draft penalties. Mooted by the phantom draft to go top 20, but dropped to 45 because of concerns not over pace, skill or anything else apart from the fact that he was very skinny and therefore was AT LEAST 2 years, and probably more, away from being able to cope with regular AFL. He is now in his third year and has played 12 games. I think all you can really expect from anyone after 12 games is a few signs that they have something. I think he has shown a few signs, not consistently, but in flashes. Didn't have a great game yesterday but he's young, he's still pretty skinny and he's playing for a team down on skill and confidence and with not that much talent. Bigger picture is that we're a few years away yet, and while we battle through those few years we HAVE to play these guys, knowing that they're young and therefore inconsistent and then it's really up to you to decide what kind of supporter you want to be, one with some kind of perspective about our list and how long it will take to fix it, or one who expects skinny kids to walk into the AFL, become champions overnight, and if they don't, sack the lot of them and start again with more skinny kids, give them 12 games on the pine and then sack them. Thank god you're not in charge simonverbeek, we'd be sacking 30 players a year, most of them 21 or under and replacing them with..... what exactly? Picks 75-100 in the draft?

It's too early to make a call on Simmo, come back at the end of next year and we'll talk then.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 10:10 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
The most imortant thing about playing Kade is for Kade to see what he really needs to do to become a 100 and then 200 game AFL footballer.
He needs to get onto the protein shakes big time and work harder in the gym.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 11:30 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17236
And Kade has the work ethic to make it at senior level and to put on these Kg's....he is the quickest at the club - but still learning the caper. Take a look at who was selected below him in that draft and possibly only Leigh Fisher, Ryan Ferguson and Brad Fisher are doing or have done better than someone like Kade. Kade is also taking a lot of direction out of the ground from Campo...might not be such a good idea - I know Campo is meant to be a leader - but he needs to let the coaching staff and runners to tell Kade what position to play while out on the ground.

Has the skills - a lovely kick of the footy - he has way too much talent to be let go. Wouldn't be paid a hell of a lot - so there is no point in discarding a player who is still very young. has what it takes and isn't costing the club a hell of a lot!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 11:39 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10631
Kade Simpson is going to become a very good AFL player.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 11:57 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 166
Location: Sydney
[quote="Dr.SHERRIN"]And Kade has the work ethic to make it at senior level and to put on these Kg's....he is the quickest at the club quote]

Synbad raises a valid point, after 3 pre-seasons Kade should have more body defination, no body's fault but his own. I said in another tread , I wonder what he would look like if he was at Geelong or Melbourne. Lions etc. Perhaps he wouldn't be on their list now because of his efforts in the Gym
We don't have the youngest team list we have the least experienced and the smallest bodies of the league. definetly not the right ingredients for DP's game plan.

Funny how protien shakes may decide Simmo's future ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 11:57 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:54 am
Posts: 2361
Location: September Baby!!!!
simonverbeek wrote:
But you can't bag Wiggins on this site - he goes so hard.

He makes me hard :oops:

_________________
Ecclesiastes 1:4, "One generation passes away, and another generation comes: but The Blues abide forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 11:59 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:54 am
Posts: 2361
Location: September Baby!!!!
peterdeano wrote:
We don't have the youngest team list we have the least experienced and the smallest bodies of the league.

Actually you are wrong - we do have the youngest team list in the competition.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 1:4, "One generation passes away, and another generation comes: but The Blues abide forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 12:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18758
Location: threeohfivethree
simonverbeek wrote:
You're all delusional.


An early sign that someone is delusional is often the belief that everyone else is... :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 12:15 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 166
Location: Sydney
darknavy wrote:
peterdeano wrote:
We don't have the youngest team list we have the least experienced and the smallest bodies of the league.

Actually you are wrong - we do have the youngest team list in the competition.


I thought someone might throw that at me, allthestats.com shows Geelong and WCE below us in age averge ranking.

Where are your stats coming from DN ? DP comments no doubt. A little accuracy goes a long way in forums.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 12:27 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:12 pm
Posts: 1291
Location: Sydney
AK43 wrote:
Can I just run a refresher past some of Simmo baggers? Drafted at the end of 2002 at number 45, our first pick in the first year of the draft penalties. Mooted by the phantom draft to go top 20, but dropped to 45 because of concerns not over pace, skill or anything else apart from the fact that he was very skinny and therefore was AT LEAST 2 years, and probably more, away from being able to cope with regular AFL. He is now in his third year and has played 12 games. I think all you can really expect from anyone after 12 games is a few signs that they have something. I think he has shown a few signs, not consistently, but in flashes. Didn't have a great game yesterday but he's young, he's still pretty skinny and he's playing for a team down on skill and confidence and with not that much talent. Bigger picture is that we're a few years away yet, and while we battle through those few years we HAVE to play these guys, knowing that they're young and therefore inconsistent and then it's really up to you to decide what kind of supporter you want to be, one with some kind of perspective about our list and how long it will take to fix it, or one who expects skinny kids to walk into the AFL, become champions overnight, and if they don't, sack the lot of them and start again with more skinny kids, give them 12 games on the pine and then sack them. Thank god you're not in charge simonverbeek, we'd be sacking 30 players a year, most of them 21 or under and replacing them with..... what exactly? Picks 75-100 in the draft?

It's too early to make a call on Simmo, come back at the end of next year and we'll talk then.


Great post AK!

simonverbeek you should apply for an AFL match committee job... I'm sure your foresight in judging a player after only 12 games will be invaluable. Pure Genius! :roll: :roll:

:x

_________________
When Dick became President, it was as if everyone at Carlton came out of the hailstorm and into the sunshine - Stephen Kernahan

YARRAN!!





.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 12:29 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:56 pm
Posts: 723
Location: Melbourne
no doubt simmo has to hit the gym big time at season's end, but what sort of game are we asking him to play here?

why don't we put him in a role where we exploit his strengths rather than one that exposes his weaknesses?

why don't we put campo in a run-with role and let campo's 11 season body take some hits, while we let simmo run amok like davey and wells and lovett do at other clubs? let's let simmo run and see what he can do.

when campo arrived in '95 he was also quite thin. we badly needed his pace and stuck him on a wing and told to go for it. he had a lot of experienced bodies around him to do all the physical stuff.

now, it's campo's turn to do likewise ... whether he likes to or not!!

last year we had campo playing that run-with role and it seemed like he was gonna play out his career like that. what the hell changed this year?

_________________
... an eagle flew out of the night. he was something to observe, came in close i heard a voice, bending stretching every nerve, had to listen had no choice ...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 12:41 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
I see him taking Campo's spot as a ball carrier...he is not an in and under and Campo and Stevens get all the easy receives.
He has a decent skill level and doesnt need remedial work like some of our players. His main problem is lack of size and playing in a team where we dont have enough quality to bring him into the game or look after him when the game is physical. He is a very slight build and confidence is a big thing when you are small...Geelong can afford to have Shannon Byrnes(Simpsons equivalent) in the team and carry him becuase they have so much talent ....Byrnes gets to learn the game without pressure.
I think he deserves another year and then he must deliver..or out..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 1:03 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:54 am
Posts: 2361
Location: September Baby!!!!
peterdeano wrote:
darknavy wrote:
peterdeano wrote:
We don't have the youngest team list we have the least experienced and the smallest bodies of the league.

Actually you are wrong - we do have the youngest team list in the competition.


I thought someone might throw that at me, allthestats.com shows Geelong and WCE below us in age averge ranking.

Where are your stats coming from DN ? DP comments no doubt. A little accuracy goes a long way in forums.


Here is the age article that I got my stats from

WHO REALLY HAS THE YOUNGEST LIST
(Average list age as of March 24, 2005)

Carlton 22 years, 282 days
West Coast 22 years, 296 days
Geelong 22 years, 325 days
Hawthorn 23 years, 15 days
Essendon* 23 years, 39 days
Bris Lions 23 years, 50 days
Collingwood 23 years, 56 days
Richmond 23 years, 59 days
Fremantle 23 years, 64 days
W Bulldogs 23 years, 107 days
Kangaroos 23 years, 152 days
Sydney 23 years, 201 days
St Kilda 23 years, 210 days
Melbourne 23 years, 227 days
Adelaide 23 years, 269 days
P Adelaide 24 years, 109 days


Insert apology here peterdeano

_________________
Ecclesiastes 1:4, "One generation passes away, and another generation comes: but The Blues abide forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 1:14 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 940
simonverbeek wrote:
The faithful have rushed to the defence of our next premiership captain kade 'diesel' simpson :shock: .

This is a very strange website. It seems you can bag any of our best 5 players and get applauded for it. Examples: Fevola's undisciplined and should be traded, Campo is shit (Deano - "kade is better than campo" - get a grip sweetie), Kouta was bagged last year (pretty quiet now arent you all), Whitnall is shit (whatever).

Bottom line - bag the good players and talkingcarlton.com will make a cult out of you.
None of you realise that we're shit because our lower tier of players are not developing and are not AFL standard. This is the problem.

But you can't bag Wiggins on this site - he goes so hard
But you can't bag Sporn on this site - superstar
But you can't bag Davies on this site - he dominates the two's
But you can't bag Bannister on this site - gun

You all watch too much bullants crap which makes some of these duds look good (Longmuir looks like John Coleman when wearing the hallowed red guernsey). Newsflash - VFL form is irrelevant. Big jump people, BIG BIG jump.

And so we come to Kade Simpson. You roll out the excuses:
He's young. he's had 1 good moment in 12 games when the ball bounced the wrong way for vandenberg (YAY!). he goes great in the VFL (so would a midget on crutches). He's got a good kick (gotta get it to kick it people!).

You're all delusional.

Call a dud a "a young player who really tries has a great kick and hasn't had enough time yewt blah blah"

OR

Call a dud a dud - and be realistic about Carlton's lower tier.

Sorry for interrupting wiggoworshippers, spornservants, and simpsonlovers - GO BACK TO BAGGING CHAMPIONS - you're all great at it.


Where do I start?

Answer: I'm not even going to bother.

You obviously won't take on board anything that I or anyone else says.

Your first sentence especially made me laugh. Could you have missed the point by a longer margin?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2005 2:29 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 166
Location: Sydney
darknavy wrote:
peterdeano wrote:
darknavy wrote:
peterdeano wrote:
We don't have the youngest team list we have the least experienced and the smallest bodies of the league.

Actually you are wrong - we do have the youngest team list in the competition.


I thought someone might throw that at me, allthestats.com shows Geelong and WCE below us in age averge ranking.

Where are your stats coming from DN ? DP comments no doubt. A little accuracy goes a long way in forums.


Here is the age article that I got my stats from

Insert apology here peterdeano


"Slap", "face moves with impact to one direction" Apology given for not knowing about the Age article. I wondered where DP was getting his info?

My turn , I would hesitate to take any facts from a newspaper article especially when it had no disclaimers on where and how they where calculated.

http://www.allthestats.com/stat/teamlists.php has proven to me to be more reliable than the Age article. My guess is that the Age has taken into account the rookies when assessing average age . But this is just sematics , yes we are still very young and inexperienced but have a good look at Geelong and WCE on the team list comparison , good list management without PP especially when Geelong has the highest ave weight and BMI per player with a younger senior list.

I think a number of players need to fast track their body development so they can be rightfully compared to the other young players now playing senior footy at other clubs.

Some mentioned Byrnes in comparsion to Kade, he looks like he is developing his body a lot quicker , why can our young players follow suit?

..........I am expecting a comment re lack of draft picks and one about the integrity of using newspaper articles. Fire away!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 144 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dodo27, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], GreatEx, jim, Noonamah Blue, pedro31 and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group