dannyboy wrote:
Ahh Jarusa the idea of debate is to shift ground as other ideas enter the fray - otherwise go away and contemplate rather than communicate.
Some might say a moving target is harder to hit.
dannyboy wrote:
the longer this goes on the clearer its becoming what is really bothering me and the more I am begining to understand Synbad's attacks.
a) No one used to leave Carlton - well get used to it, those days are dead and buried and we trasde away players as fast as the next club. There is no loyalty, only mateship, leadership, a chance to win a flag and money. Each player must weigh them up.
Huge generalisation. Arguments could be made that players are more loyal now than they were in the 60s 70s or 80s. There are plenty of examples around now of individual players turning down big money to stay at clubs.
Don't let your rosy view of history get in the way.
Don't become one of those old men who say 'when I was a boy'.
dannyboy wrote:
b) Hamill - who cares? He left. Others leave. Its the hypocracy of if they come to Carlton they are good guys if they leave it can only be for money! Barass left to coach and to get more money! He stated it as so. As for media commitments etc - did you never watch Barass's TV show - he was the original TV leader - helped put carlton on the map of rthousands of little kiddies watching his Mr Football show!
Are you seriously trying to argue that Media coverage of football is at the same levels or lower now than it was 40 years ago?
dannyboy wrote:
c) Leadership/captaincy - if you honestly think that anyone coul;d have captained the Aussie cricket team and it wouldn;t have mattered then you understand very little about sport. Put warne in charge of that team and it would self-destruct! Put Lehman in charge and it would have been so laid back that the results would have dwindled. It is a belittlement of the leadership we have had top think anyone could do as good a job. That's Grant thomas territory there and it is wrong. Injuries and a poor captain (at this point) are killing St Kilda! No everyone can or should captain. its a fallacy that thomas is beginning to understand. You need to identify the leader(s) and then get them to lead!
C'mon dannyboy, putting words in my mouth there. I dislike Warne more than most, but even he would have a successful captain at test level. So would you!
dannyboy wrote:
d) Waite and T- Bird - nothing either of these two great kids ahve done has shown me they are captain material - now they might be one day but I haven't seen evidence of it yet!
I reckon Waite has got "IT". One more year from Kouta then Waite is ready and the Waite will be over for leadership.
Can't Waite.
