Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 2:21 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Interesting reading
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17537
Location: Left Cuckistan
I've stolen this directly from Dockerland (my mate sent it to me - freak!) but as the guy didn't have a Carlton Clem disclaimer under his name I figured it was fair game to take and use.

I just thought it was a really interesting read. Bit scary when you think about the comparison between the two clubs and the work we have in front of us ...


Begins ...


As we stagger through our 11th season in the AFL, there’s a lot of talk about the “cultureâ€

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:14 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
Pretty interesting that - good point of view as well and shows where we are at.

Dockers certainly didnt get the hand outs either that some "new clubs" got when they first joined.

between the retirement of alot of core group, no draft picks and a number of other things the club really was set back years.

But alas - i think with the kids we have coming through they are really starting to show something (i.e. Walker, Waite, Thorton, Livingston etc..) so all is not lost.

Do we have as good as squad as Fremantle? Not at the moment we dont but that is only becuase our kids are still relatively new with most playing under 50 games.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:19 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
Very interesting.

Both Fremantle and Carlton are almost similar.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Interesting reading
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:26 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:23 am
Posts: 1797
Location: Half Back Flanker...
Heavs wrote:
Port Adelaide 14 + 5
Sydney 14 + 3
Brisbane 14 + 2
Melbourne 11 + 4
Adelaide 11 + 3
Essendon* 11 + 3
West Coast 10 + 2
Collingwood 9 + 6
Richmond 9 + 5
Hawthorn 9 + 3
Kangaroos 8 + 5
Geelong 8 + 3
Bulldogs 8 + 3
St Kilda 7 + 4
Carlton 5 + 7
Fremantle 5 + 7


But what's the point of this ladder...??

Sure, we are down the bottom...with St Kilda and Geelong...(the good end??)

& Port Adelaide, Brisbane and Melbourne are at the other end with Essendon* and Collingwood... :?

Am I supposed to be happy or sad???

_________________
"...that's the thing about opinion - you don't have to know anything to have one..." Andre Agassi commenting on Pat Cash 2004
"...the less you know - the more you believe..." - Bono 2006


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Interesting reading
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:40 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 1959
Location: Elwood
Wet Willie wrote:
Heavs wrote:
Port Adelaide 14 + 5
Sydney 14 + 3
Brisbane 14 + 2
Melbourne 11 + 4
Adelaide 11 + 3
Essendon* 11 + 3
West Coast 10 + 2
Collingwood 9 + 6
Richmond 9 + 5
Hawthorn 9 + 3
Kangaroos 8 + 5
Geelong 8 + 3
Bulldogs 8 + 3
St Kilda 7 + 4
Carlton 5 + 7
Fremantle 5 + 7


But what's the point of this ladder...??

Sure, we are down the bottom...with St Kilda and Geelong...(the good end??)

& Port Adelaide, Brisbane and Melbourne are at the other end with Essendon* and Collingwood... :?

Am I supposed to be happy or sad???


"Don't worry be Happy " :D

_________________
I know a little secret. And i'm not sharing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:03 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 2663
The Dockers really are a joke though aren't they? Their supporters are still looking for excuses when the reality is that they -

- share the greatest home ground advantage in the league (we've lost ours, via a lack of support from the AFL)
- can breach the salary cap and only get a minor penalty (whatever happened to Fabian Francis)
- they have a spate of premiership midfielders who request to come 'home' to the Dockers, thus giving them the upper hand in any bargaining (Bell, J Carr, Headland, Schofield) not to mention the quality of McPharlin, M Carr and Black.
- if they do make the finals they get to play on their HOME turf, not a neutral venue in their state. (Imagine how easily we would have won all of the finals we were involved in during the 90's if we'd been able to play them at Optus.)

The Dockers are well looked after by the sysyems in place by the AFL and underperform horrendously. I have no time for the Dockers at all. Crap club. if they were serious about establishing a culture around the footy club they would look at playing their games in a venue actually in Fremantle. As it is they are just 'eagles lite'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:09 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:49 pm
Posts: 291
Location: Monte Carlo
Interesting read. Some food for thought

_________________
You can just smell that fresh Carlton arrogance coming back into the air


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:16 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:54 am
Posts: 2361
Location: September Baby!!!!
What about a third column - Number of top 10 draft picks since 2000 -
carlton 2 dockers 19

_________________
Ecclesiastes 1:4, "One generation passes away, and another generation comes: but The Blues abide forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:39 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
You'd think their midfield would stack up really well against the competition heavyweights. They have runners, they have hard ball getters. All of them would get spots in our team.

Inside players:
J.Carr
M.Carr
P.Hasleby

Outside players:
P.Bell
H.Black
D.Headland

And that's just for starters.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:43 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20270
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
really makes you think...

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:25 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 10:50 pm
Posts: 809
showbag wrote:
The Dockers really are a joke though aren't they? Their supporters are still looking for excuses when the reality is that they -

- share the greatest home ground advantage in the league (we've lost ours, via a lack of support from the AFL)
- can breach the salary cap and only get a minor penalty (whatever happened to Fabian Francis)
- they have a spate of premiership midfielders who request to come 'home' to the Dockers, thus giving them the upper hand in any bargaining (Bell, J Carr, Headland, Schofield) not to mention the quality of McPharlin, M Carr and Black.
- if they do make the finals they get to play on their HOME turf, not a neutral venue in their state. (Imagine how easily we would have won all of the finals we were involved in during the 90's if we'd been able to play them at Optus.)

The Dockers are well looked after by the sysyems in place by the AFL and underperform horrendously. I have no time for the Dockers at all. Crap club. if they were serious about establishing a culture around the footy club they would look at playing their games in a venue actually in Fremantle. As it is they are just 'eagles lite'.


Nice one showbag, well articulated, but did you have to bring up that salary cap stuff again....To quote GMDP, "I am not looking in the rear view mirror", but God it shits me, 2 sets of rules!

However, I'll ask the question.. Would you rather spend a night watching the footy with a Dockers or a Crows supporter?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Hmmmmmmmmmm..... interesting... very interesting...














What does it mean????

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:57 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
ThePrez wrote:
Dockers certainly didnt get the hand outs either that some "new clubs" got when they first joined.


What's that supposed to mean?

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:01 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
showbag wrote:
The Dockers really are a joke though aren't they? Their supporters are still looking for excuses when the reality is that they -

- share the greatest home ground advantage in the league (we've lost ours, via a lack of support from the AFL)
- can breach the salary cap and only get a minor penalty (whatever happened to Fabian Francis)
- they have a spate of premiership midfielders who request to come 'home' to the Dockers, thus giving them the upper hand in any bargaining (Bell, J Carr, Headland, Schofield) not to mention the quality of McPharlin, M Carr and Black.
- if they do make the finals they get to play on their HOME turf, not a neutral venue in their state. (Imagine how easily we would have won all of the finals we were involved in during the 90's if we'd been able to play them at Optus.)

The Dockers are well looked after by the sysyems in place by the AFL and underperform horrendously. I have no time for the Dockers at all. Crap club. if they were serious about establishing a culture around the footy club they would look at playing their games in a venue actually in Fremantle. As it is they are just 'eagles lite'.


There's some good points in there, and even a little bit of truth in the home ground thing. Indeed I agree with much of what you've written. But the fact is under the guise of the AFL, Carlton has probably benefitted just as much, if not more, from "home" games in finals than any non-Victorian club. But as usual people based in Melbourne seem unable to grasp this concept.

And don't try and pretend that a Carlton v Freo final played at the MCG would be on neutral turf.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:13 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24655
Location: Kaloyasena
camelboy wrote:
But the fact is under the guise of the AFL, Carlton has probably benefitted just as much, if not more, from "home" games in finals than any non-Victorian club. But as usual people based in Melbourne seem unable to grasp this concept.


The final we got against the West Coast in Melbourne (in 99) only makes up for the reaming we got by having to play Brisbane in Brisbane in the 96 finals series.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:14 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
camelboy wrote:
ThePrez wrote:
Dockers certainly didnt get the hand outs either that some "new clubs" got when they first joined.


What's that supposed to mean?


Like the concessions that the Weagles, Crows etc.. got
I think the AFL realised they gave them all to much and toned it down a little when Freo came in is all.

Freo compared to the other "new" sides got less than the other "new" sides did is all

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:38 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
ThePrez wrote:
camelboy wrote:
ThePrez wrote:
Dockers certainly didnt get the hand outs either that some "new clubs" got when they first joined.


What's that supposed to mean?


Like the concessions that the Weagles, Crows etc.. got
I think the AFL realised they gave them all to much and toned it down a little when Freo came in is all.

Freo compared to the other "new" sides got less than the other "new" sides did is all


Fair enough, but they also probably weren't as able to hide players in their local leagues either like the Crows and the Eagles may have been able to do in order to maximise their opportunities. Second child always does it differently to the first.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:14 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 2663
camelboy wrote:
showbag wrote:
The Dockers really are a joke though aren't they? Their supporters are still looking for excuses when the reality is that they -

- share the greatest home ground advantage in the league (we've lost ours, via a lack of support from the AFL)
- can breach the salary cap and only get a minor penalty (whatever happened to Fabian Francis)
- they have a spate of premiership midfielders who request to come 'home' to the Dockers, thus giving them the upper hand in any bargaining (Bell, J Carr, Headland, Schofield) not to mention the quality of McPharlin, M Carr and Black.
- if they do make the finals they get to play on their HOME turf, not a neutral venue in their state. (Imagine how easily we would have won all of the finals we were involved in during the 90's if we'd been able to play them at Optus.)

The Dockers are well looked after by the sysyems in place by the AFL and underperform horrendously. I have no time for the Dockers at all. Crap club. if they were serious about establishing a culture around the footy club they would look at playing their games in a venue actually in Fremantle. As it is they are just 'eagles lite'.


There's some good points in there, and even a little bit of truth in the home ground thing. Indeed I agree with much of what you've written. But the fact is under the guise of the AFL, Carlton has probably benefitted just as much, if not more, from "home" games in finals than any non-Victorian club. But as usual people based in Melbourne seem unable to grasp this concept.

And don't try and pretend that a Carlton v Freo final played at the MCG would be on neutral turf.


Camel,
i can't speak for people in Melbourne as i am in Perth (and from Perth if that makes any difference) but as far as i see it, a "home state" final is very different to a "home ground" final. A final on your 'home ground' in your 'home state' is therefore a huge advantage.

I don't see us as being on an equal playing field with the Dockers when it comes to the terms of a home final. That may all be different now though as we don't have the same stronghold at the dome as we did at optus, in terms of a home ground advantage .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:23 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2143
showbag wrote:
The Dockers really are a joke though aren't they? Their supporters are still looking for excuses when the reality is that they -

- share the greatest home ground advantage in the league (we've lost ours, via a lack of support from the AFL)
- can breach the salary cap and only get a minor penalty (whatever happened to Fabian Francis)
-
The Dockers are well looked after by the sysyems in place by the AFL and underperform horrendously. I have no time for the Dockers at all. Crap club. if they were serious about establishing a culture around the footy club they would look at playing their games in a venue actually in Fremantle. As it is they are just 'eagles lite'.


Showbag, I wouldn't mind being reminded about the Fabian Francis case.

How much over the cap were they?

I was thinking on the bus this morning about the Lions. I was glad they beat Essendon* in the first of their grand finals...but if you add it up over three years they were over everyone else's cap by about 2 million dollars.
No wonder they kept winning.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group