DocSherrin wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
Alternatively another question is - should Carlton pay money towards an equalisation fund that assists St Kilda, North Melbourne, Port and Melbourne?
2. Yes. They should. But your question should be
'how much should Carlton pay...' Because essentially, all clubs - for some time now have agreed to handouts from the future fund and now an equalisation fund. Sure some eyebrows were raised - but the overall consensus has been that the AFL is one of the world’s least-equalised sporting competitions.
tap...it's worth noting point 4 from the competitive balance measures.
6. Stronger accountability and performance management – help smaller Clubs which benefit from increased distributions from the AFL to improve performance, grow revenues and to be accountable for delivering on key targets.
The only thing Carlton need concern itself with is itself.
I understand where you are coming from, but I think we should be able to analyse/question/gather information on how these funds are distributed.
At present, the AFL isn't questioned by journalists or anyone for that matter on why/how much they give to certain clubs. It is just assumed that they are handing out these funds in an equitable manner.
Who decides what is "equitable" and why? I see and hear a lot about "equitability" but not much of it is directed in Carlton's way. I hope hand outs aren't judged just on revenue - surely it should be judged on other factors as well such as the performance of teams. eg if a certain team has not played in a preliminary final since 2000 perhaps it is wise to hold off taxing them at the higher rate for a while.
For example, I have gone through the
AFL annual reports and have found that Hawthorn has received extra money from this future fund/equalisation fund...why ? on what grounds? How do we get this information or do we just assume it was justified? Where are the journalists asking these questions?
This one - the "continued Supplemental / Discretionary funds, which compensate smaller clubs for structural inequities" – - I would like to
see greater disclosure from the AFL on how this operates..If the AFL was a private company -keep it hidden, but the AFL's stakeholders are primarily their fans. They have the right to know.
Then there is this one - funds are given to clubs to help
"grow revenues". Surely Carlton should be given funds from the AFL in regards to this one. Carlton is technically the 2nd most supported club in the league but is about 6th or whatever on the membership table. How about the AFL divert some funds to the Carlton's membership/marketing department. Let's see the AFL help this club "grow revenues"...or perhaps Carlton doesn't really matter to AFL management?