Synbad wrote:
Look.. i think most clubs are unprofessional.. and were at the bottom 3 or 4 of those.
We dont understand aboriginals...I mean fancy not giving Betts his extra 4k for being an interstate kid when we went and plucked him from Kalgoorlie...Yes i know he was living here for 2 odd years... IN A BOARDINGHOUSE ON AN INDIGENOUS PLAYER SCHOLARSHIP!!!..
Your assessment may well be right Synbad, but I'm not sure that the Betts example supports you.
The salaries and conditions of 1st year players are set out in the CBA. They are not minimum conditions - a club is not allowed to pay more than is prescribed*. There was some doubt about whether Betts was an interstate recruit who was entitled to receive a relocation allowance or not. If Carlton had paid him it, and the AFL subsequently classified him as a Victorian recruit, the AFL may have penalised us for making an illegal payment. By notifying a grievance, the club and Betts were protected from any retrospective decision regarding his status.
For all we know, Carlton wanted to pay him the allowance and supported his entitlement to it before the Grievance Tribunal.
Does anyone know that the Grievance Tribunal decided? It may have ruled in his favour.
* You might remember that Murphy was offered a lucrative deal by Brisbane to sign up as a father/son pick. But this doesn't contradict my point. Brisbane offered a 5 year deal. It included only the prescribed payments for a 3rd round draft pick who would be an interstate recruit, but then provided lucrative conditions for the remaining 3 years of the contract.