TheSwan wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
emtwenty wrote:
ben Lennon was pick 12 in 2013 which was a bumper draft & looking like a draft for the ages.
Richmond's first pick this year is pick 13 in a shallow draft where anything after pick 10 is equivalent to a second rounder in any other draft.
Lennon might be the better option this year.
Yeah, a pick that Richmond would rather keep, they want to trade Lennon instead. We are trying to rebuild a list, we shouldn't simply be settling on players just because they may appear to be a 'fair trade' on paper. Been there, done that to death. Richmond probably want to keep pick 13 because they have plans for it - the kind of thing we should be doing. Well, if they want Yarran they should be prepared to pay. The onus should be on Richmond if Yarran is contracted.
We don't know if Carlton has been in Lennon's ear and suggesting he quits Rich. Perhaps Rich do not want to part with him at all but we are the one's who have been assertive and forced Richmond's hand. We know Rich have been in Yarran's ear for some time.
I would be very surprised if Rich were happy to see Lennon go. I think this one is on us.
Did anyone think at all that we are the one's over rating our player? What has Yarran done? Here is a man with so much skill and speed yet does SFA to get the most out of himself. He is 25 soon and is not getting any better. Let Richmond deal with the inconsistency and lack of effort.
Let's be ruthless and aggressive at the trade table but don't be disappointed when the deal is done and you wanted everything for a B grade player and got realistic compensation instead.
Hawthorn gave up pick 19 last year for O'Rourke, who was uncontracted (i think), and hadn't shown much!
Yarran is a matchwinner, and under contract; you don't induce a player to break his contract, and then not pay up.
You usually pay overs not unders in this scenario...
In the words of David King, pick 12 is a steal for the Tigers...