fevolaaaa wrote:
McKaysMistress wrote:
budzy wrote:
I shake my head and laugh in utter amazement when I read that Pagan and the club are fuming....PFFT!!!

WHY DIDN'T THE CLUB TRADE LANCE WHEN THEY HAD THE CHANCE!!!!!
I could not agree more.
"IF" this story is true, we have absolutely nothing to be "fuming" about.
We knew what he was like. We knew what his motivation was at the end of last year. We knew he wouldn't have the same motivation this year. And we still re-signed him
The club is not entitled to complain about a thing.
Totally agree. One line in the Sheahan article sums it up for me, and echoes what Effes, Synbad and I have been saying:
Quote:
Third, he would not have dared turn up 8kg overweight had Melbourne successfully negotiated his release from Optus Oval a month ago.
Of course he wouldn't want to leave Carlton, he'd have to prove himself and actually do something elsewhere. No wonder he was so desperate to remove any performance clauses
179 games in 9 seasons................let's think about that................
That's damn close to 20 games per year EVERY year since debut at 17. Not only that, he has been in our best 6 players EVERY year since debut.
Take out a couple of games through injury, some attributed to weight, some just bad luck, some stupidety.
Find me a player from any other team that has performed to this level at all, let alone do it in the worst team over the last 5 years.
Can anyone argue that Lance hasn't been our best player from 2001-2005?
Give the poor bastard the benefit of the doubt. If he's already shed half the weight it's obviously a bit of fluid that any diuretic pill could fix

.
Seriously, some on this site and in the media are just busting their arse to find another Lance story to fill in their afternoon,
GET OVER IT!!
