Andain wrote:
Is Lance overpaid for what he does? Yes
Is Lance a real defender who can negate a class Key Position forward? No
Is Lance necessary down back considering our weak defense? Yes
Is he necessary up forward or even helpful at this point? No
He would be fantastic if we had two solid key defenders who could take the tall forwards and regulary beat them. That we don't have those isn't Lance's fault, and we can't blame him for his slow speed and lack of height. He's never going to be Matthew Scarlett. He's at his best in defense when he's playing Teagues role (which is probably why Teague's no longer in the side) and what we've got to do now is find those two key position players we need to make our defense solid. Whether the answer to that comes from Thornton, Saddington and Livo, or from our younger kids like Hartlett, Kennedy, Aisake, Bower and Edwards is what we've now got to figure out.
Isn't stating the obvious fun

That is true but i think the point is Whitnall is playing in the easiest position on the field and is getting paid probably just as much as a Scarlett. Last year people say Whitnall had a good season....I think he had an ordinary season, he played without an opponent when back however whille never really hurting the opposition.
In a few years we will have JR and Walker on each flank doing the marking, running and then making the assists.
Lance should of been traded if he is being using 3rd man up.