slow_mo wrote:
If the coach doesn't have ultimate responsibility for the performance of the team, who does jimmae?
The team. As a unit. This does include the coach.
slow_mo wrote:
Pagan isn't from the Parkin school of player empowerment. For the most part he stripped the players of their individuality to make sure they get the basics right - but 4 years later they still don't!
Do you feel this is due to all, some or most of the players being incapable? Do you feel that a lack of skills shown on the field is entirely due to Denis not working on them? Do you feel Denis actually stripped their right to individuality or do you feel that the professionalism that was sorely lacking from the CFC was more due to player empowerment being used when it shouldn't have been (ie. 1997 onwards)?
slow_mo wrote:
The game plan doesn't play to our strengths, he insists on flooding which requires a high level of fitness, but we don't rotate our midfield to the bench therefore they run out of steam. Our forward line is our strength and yet they are pushed too far up the ground or grossly outnumbered.
Why should Denis be absolved of all responsibility?
What are our strengths in your opinion?
Maybe our players should be fitter, everyone else can do what we do.
Maybe we cost ourselves the portion of the game we rotate these players off for because the others aren't ready.
Ok there's a strength, but what good is a forward line without the ball going down their end, what do you think Denis is trying to do to shelter our young midfield?
Who said Denis doesn't get some of the blame? Who says Denis gets all of the blame? Who says Denis is doing the wrong thing? Who says the players aren't able to follow through with what he wants them to do? Who says that could be for a lot of different reasons?
Who says any of us have any real idea? Who says some of us do? Who thinks anyone is still reading this? Who thinks too many questions are being asked? Who thinks not enough questions are being asked?
On and on and on it goes, where will it stop, nobody knows.
Questioning a coach, coaching a developing 22, with so little real depth it makes you want to cry, about why is his team is shit and why he can't do anything more about it, is becoming a fine art amongst Carlton supporters.
Geeing up our players would be nice, but do you want them to go and win a flag this year? Next year? Where does that place Carlton long term?
We are still educating a lot of our 22 because in reality a lot of them should be on the periphery of a side, not smack bang in the middle of it.
But there's nowhere for them to hide when they get scared, not many they can turn around and pass the ball to, and they won't admit that it happens to the media or to us, but it happens.
CarltonClem wrote:
You are in la-la land. It's part of the coach's responsibility to motivate his players. If they couldn't get motivated by a game versus Collingwood, then we're really in deep sh*t. If you want to completely absolve the coach of any responsibility, then I suppose you have no idea what the word 'accountability' or the word 'responsibility' means.
See above.