Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 4:55 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 935 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 ... 47  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:07 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:28 pm
Posts: 2220
I remember when we beat Brisbane at Princes Park by 89 points, I think it was in 2001.

After that match Brisbane strung together 13 wins or so and won the flag.

Matthews and probably others as well must have got into his players heads in a way which made them believe that they could achieve.

While clearly Carlton is nowhere near the potential of Brisbane at that time, if we had players that responded better to the coach, we might have not put in the bad first quarters that have cost us at least 2 wins...

Young players need to be developed, but a big part of the problem is motivating the players to play for the jumper.

So I'd say that part of the problem is a communication issue.

Pagan cant inspire and motivate players in the way that other coaches can.

_________________
My Blue Heaven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Clem:
Hello, I'm not the Carlton Football Club.

What I want and what they do are two different things. But I can see where he's coming from, and who is pressuring him into doing it.

You're heaping too much onto Denis IMO.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:08 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:39 pm
Posts: 1611
Location: charleston sc usa
Wild Blue Yonder wrote:
THe trouble is Jimmae, Pagan's best with what he's got is not good enough.

The defensive flood migh see us stay competitive for a quarter or two but its does nothing to develop players, nor win games.

It is entirely his responsibility. No one elses.


Totally agree with this statement we are all looking forward to see our young guys rotated thru the seniors and allowing our boys to ATTACK a game of freaking football. (not this flooding the centre to backline crap keeps us comptetive doesnt make us WIN!!!!)


How confidence building is it when you coach is going into every game tryin to avoid a humilation and not get the win. LET THE BOYS PLAY FOR flower SAKE PAGAN

_________________
Can smell the gf its there for the taking we are the form side


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:12 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Now you're trying to shaft Denis' share of the blame onto Smorgon.

It's kind of hard to get us back into the black when we're losing games like we did on Sunday. At least if we get beaten with kids on the park, they might show something and who knows, the kids might actually get us over the line if they show enough collectively.

Denis has little faith in kids. Clarkson has followed a youth policy and he's not doing too badly over at Hawthorn (he might have lost on the weekend but they've done ok over 5 weeks, certainly better than us). If I were a Hawks supporter, I'd stay on the bandwagon, because a few of their kids have shown quite a bit and I am hopeful, even though they suffer losses occasionally. It also seems Clarkson shows confidence in his kids - his handling of Dawson was good. Even good fullbacks get smashed up from time to time (we saw SOS have his off days).

You seem to be trying to shield Denis from any blame and will blame anyone but him. Why should he not be accountable for what's happened on the field?

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:16 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Would three coaches in a row winning wooden spoons be a record?

We crurrently have wooden spoons from two out of two. I wonder if the new coach would get the responisibility for the wooden spoon this year?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
I'm not shielding him at all.. I'm merely diverting some of it from him.

You cannot sit there and point at the bloke and say everything that is happening is his fault.

Where I differ from you (and a growing number of posters) is that you feel he is the most responsible, and I feel this is not the case.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:28 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3194
Location: Whistler
jimmae wrote:
Clem, you want them to win games of football or develop?

What you're asking for with your suggestions is to develop 100%, and bugger up any chance of winning, probably shooting their confidence to pieces.

The VFL is for developing. Unfortunately in many cases we don't have that option so we're developing while trying to win.


If you had listened to Pagan pre-game om ABC radio, I'm not sure you would be so convinced. It was very depressing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:28 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: Perth
Sooner or later the development of those kids will require them to win some games, or play the sort of footy that will allow them to.

Look at the Hawks last year. Clarkson got them playing attacking, free-spirited footy and they are chockers with confidence now.

Our boys are pretty much driftwood, and don't seem to be getting much of an education on how to win footy games.

I don't see that as very good for their development at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:34 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8229
verbs wrote:
Would three coaches in a row winning wooden spoons be a record?

We crurrently have wooden spoons from two out of two. I wonder if the new coach would get the responisibility for the wooden spoon this year?
Sure Sk.Kilda must've managed at some stage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Ponkstar wrote:
Sooner or later the development of those kids will require them to win some games, or play the sort of footy that will allow them to.

Look at the Hawks last year. Clarkson got them playing attacking, free-spirited footy and they are chockers with confidence now.

Our boys are pretty much driftwood, and don't seem to be getting much of an education on how to win footy games.

I don't see that as very good for their development at all.

We don't have a 22 that we can say "we can play good footy with this 22 over the next few years."

They did.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:48 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8229
BlueLife wrote:
kingkerna wrote:
wow bluelife - by your comments we should be half decent in about 7 years time!!! This is not good enough, I don't want DP to ride us down and then take all the glory for getting us up on the back of being a terrible team.
Someone else mentioned that we don't want to rush in finding a replacement - we could have an interim coach similar to Jezza in 89' which would then give us plenty of time to source the right man for the job. I am sure Mitchell won't mind filling in


I would suggest you are being delusional if you think that a different coach since 2003 would have resulted in us playing finals now (which is what being half decent should equate to).

We simply don't have the champions and leaders in the 26-31 age bracket that really top teams have. We won't have them for another 4 or 5 years. It pains me as much as I'm sure it pains you, but that is the stark realiity. The 2000, 2002 & 2003 drafts set us back the best part of 10 years. If you want the coaching staff to be the scapegoats for that then fine, change the coach - but it won't have a major impact on getting us where we want to be.
2002 we at least got Simmo and Fisher, not bad types at all (one's being misused badly at present, the other is as good an overhead mark for his sizeI've seen), and thankfully missed out on Goddard (Wells would've been handy). In 2003 we got Walker and Steven (PSD admittedly, but a bonus given our penalties). Probably did better there in the draft there than sides that finished in the 8 and get normal 1st & 2nd round selections, although it hasn't affected Sydney or Geelong at all given there's few, if any, high selections in either team. Draft penalites are just another Pagan cop-out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
verbs wrote:
Would three coaches in a row winning wooden spoons be a record?

We crurrently have wooden spoons from two out of two. I wonder if the new coach would get the responisibility for the wooden spoon this year?


No it wouldnt.. the record is held by Stkilda.. 15 coaches in a row...
Look i dont give a fu(k about wooden spoons .. i just want to see things done properly, kids developing and we have a game plan we can fine tune... the players play with passion and thats all i ask for.

We wont win the spoon forever..

What we do have is a bunch of great kids.. and more coming.. but the process needs to be upto date so we give ourselves every opportunity to allow Walker Murph etc to bring home the bacon...
Thats all it should be about now...making this period COUNT inside the timeframe the kids will be playing football.
We owe it to them and ourselves.

Pagan isnt capable of doing it.. because they arent responding.

the spoons are of no consequence except as an avenue to the next club champions.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:53 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3194
Location: Whistler
jimmae wrote:
I'm not shielding him at all.. I'm merely diverting some of it from him.

You cannot sit there and point at the bloke and say everything that is happening is his fault.

Where I differ from you (and a growing number of posters) is that you feel he is the most responsible, and I feel this is not the case.


Do you think our boys look like they are learning anything on-field? Do you think having 16 players backward of centre is a motivation to go in harder?

Do you think hearing the coach state on radio that the flood is because we do better with numbers behind the ball and that if we played more man on man it's harder to stop the blowouts? This in spite of the fact that in most games this year we have not been too bad in the one-on-one contested possession stakes.

Put yourself on the field. Do you think you would be motivated to play that style? be a forward instructed to keep running to the wing and even HBF? To be Andrew Walker runing off HBF or deeper and when he gets to the centre ready to kick inside 50, see a wall of 4 opposition and 1 Fevola?

Does that give you a good mental image? Is that likely to get your best disposal to come out?

WHY do you think players who have shown that they do have good skills are struggling to produce it on -field? And I'm talking of Stevens, Scotland, Lappin, Simmo, even Murphy now ...

I'm not attacking Pagan, I'm just saying it is not working. There is no point going on with him. If we are going to cop beltings, I'd rather it be trying to create something with a forward line instead of 16 backmen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:57 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:39 pm
Posts: 1611
Location: charleston sc usa
true headplant!!!!!!!!!!!!

go down fighting as opposed tothe over defensive that we are doing now

_________________
Can smell the gf its there for the taking we are the form side


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Ok, it's now just a thread between myself and those who want Pagan gone, futile argument.

Hope it all works out for everybody in the end.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 9:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
They wouldnt be enjoying being the patsies that are out there to preserve Denis career.

Its pretty selfish ...

They should be out there playing, enjoying (after all theyre a young group) and learning ..

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 10:00 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 2550
Location: Safe distance away
Headplant wrote:
jimmae wrote:
I'm not shielding him at all.. I'm merely diverting some of it from him.

You cannot sit there and point at the bloke and say everything that is happening is his fault.

Where I differ from you (and a growing number of posters) is that you feel he is the most responsible, and I feel this is not the case.


Do you think our boys look like they are learning anything on-field? Do you think having 16 players backward of centre is a motivation to go in harder?

Do you think hearing the coach state on radio that the flood is because we do better with numbers behind the ball and that if we played more man on man it's harder to stop the blowouts? This in spite of the fact that in most games this year we have not been too bad in the one-on-one contested possession stakes.

Put yourself on the field. Do you think you would be motivated to play that style? be a forward instructed to keep running to the wing and even HBF? To be Andrew Walker runing off HBF or deeper and when he gets to the centre ready to kick inside 50, see a wall of 4 opposition and 1 Fevola?

Does that give you a good mental image? Is that likely to get your best disposal to come out?

WHY do you think players who have shown that they do have good skills are struggling to produce it on -field? And I'm talking of Stevens, Scotland, Lappin, Simmo, even Murphy now ...

I'm not attacking Pagan, I'm just saying it is not working. There is no point going on with him. If we are going to cop beltings, I'd rather it be trying to create something with a forward line instead of 16 backmen.



What he said.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 10:05 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
We have a decent forward line and we've kicked 13 or fewer goals in each game...

Truly appalling statistics. I think GWS had a great post earlier tonight...couldn't have said it any better.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 10:14 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24660
Location: Kaloyasena
Synbad wrote:
The deal needs to be done.. someone needs to tap him on the shoulder and point him to the stables...

Thats life... everyone has a used by date...



1000 Legends in for $1000 - PAGAN OUT!!! :wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 10:21 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:10 am
Posts: 881
Location: Netherlands
Just out of interest - did we get belted more in 2003 than 2002?


Last edited by Pickle on Mon May 08, 2006 10:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 935 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 ... 47  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group