Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 5:27 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 153 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 9:11 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Melbourne
Well Ballistic he better be tanking because if he aint then his coaching tactics have lot to be desired ..... hope the players know what he is doing

he effort against the crows was dam poor so either he is failing badly as a coach or he is tanking and pulling the breaks when we start to get a bit of confidence and start to score.

_________________
CFC TAC Squad everyone over 25 must be traded sounds like Loguns Run


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 9:52 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:20 pm
Posts: 789
Location: Melbourne
I think it's a great idea for the club to be out talking to any and all possible recruits. Don't know where we might finish and how the players may be rated after the draft camp but they all have to know that we would like to have them at the club.

Would like two young mobile ruckmen, two key position defenders, a running back pocket, a couple of dashing half back flankers, some more onballers in fact anyone with the skill ability drive desire and courage to be a Carlton player.

Just by the way am I correct that under the new priority pick rules of not winning more than 4 games in two seasons we are the only club entitled to a priority pick this year if we don't win 4 games?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 9:54 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
ballistic blues wrote:
i have no doubt Denis is tanking........ he is to good of a coach to be coaching the way he is right now.

and to tell you the truth i dont see any harm in it, we need all the talent we can get.


Why tank? We can't get a priority pick and the draft is supposed to be very even, so difference between 1 & 8 will not be great. Maybe he's not as good as you think he is.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 9:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18082
amazonstud wrote:
Just by the way am I correct that under the new priority pick rules of not winning more than 4 games in two seasons we are the only club entitled to a priority pick this year if we don't win 4 games?


We exceeded our "quota" last year.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 9:57 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
can we just a have a big @#$%&! banner explaining that one I can see its going to drive me crazy before the year is out.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 9:59 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
We won 4 + a draw last year. I think we are trying to argue the draw should not be included.

I think we need a sticky!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 10:07 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
I reckon they should count 10 goal thrashings, a P.P for every four of those - :lol:

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 10:19 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
BlueWorld wrote:
We won 4 + a draw last year. I think we are trying to argue the draw should not be included.



Are we calling it a meaningless draw???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 10:57 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:20 pm
Posts: 789
Location: Melbourne
Dannyboy,

The new priority pick rule is that you can't win more than 4 games in 2 consecutive seasons. Every other club won 5 games or more last year. If the AFL says that our draw counts then we don't get a priority pick but if it's not a win then we could end up with 3 picks in the first 20 of the draft if we don't win more than 4 games this year. Our first pick, then the priority pick after the first round of selections and then our next pick early in the second round.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 11:34 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Tanking i can semi understand with the position we're in - not saying i aggree with it, just saying i understand it.

But you can be competitive even if you are tanking. There is no excuse for that!

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: It will be academic
PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2006 11:37 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
I reckon we will win more than 4 -3rd win will come up on Sunday against Port -and we still have to play Richmond Hawthorn and Kangas and still reckon we could beat the shockers here as well


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It will be academic
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 12:08 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
frank dardew wrote:
I reckon we will win more than 4 -3rd win will come up on Sunday against Port -and we still have to play Richmond Hawthorn and Kangas and still reckon we could beat the shockers here as well


Based on our recent form???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: It will be academic
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 12:16 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2166
Location: East Melbourne
frank dardew wrote:
I reckon we will win more than 4 -3rd win will come up on Sunday against Port -and we still have to play Richmond Hawthorn and Kangas and still reckon we could beat the shockers here as well

We still play the Bummers again too...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 12:20 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
You giuys make it sound like we will win 8 this year.. and then what???

We have huge issues!!!.. winning games of footy right now means nothing... like it meant nothing in 2004...

what we need is a huge shakeup in the match committee/ coaching area and an injection of talent to develop.

Anything else will kill us

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 1:19 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:52 pm
Posts: 1857
Geezus!!

We have one group saying there's little difference in the quality of kids from 1-8 so we should win games; and then we have another saying winning means nothing and we should tank to get the best kid possible even if he isn't much different from the next!

WTF?? Maybe that's why Pagan's confused?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 8:45 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
BlueWorld wrote:
We won 4 + a draw last year. I think we are trying to argue the draw should not be included.

I think we need a sticky!!!


Apparantly no one reads them anyway

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Wins
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 9:18 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Synbad agree that we need big shake up and didnt say anything about winning 8 games and dont think we shouldnt have a huge cull of PLAYERS AND OFFICIALS at the end of the year
However dont believe in tanking and I think we have improved from last year so can win 5-6 games for the year -I dont think we will be the worst team in the AFL this year and I DONT think Richmond Port Hawthorn Essendon* are much better than us
On form Port will beat us but they are not consistent and if they have a downer we will win
I still believe it is important for the psyche of young players like Murphy simpson bentick walker kennedy to win some games - I consider that the development of wiggins sporn livo and a few others have been stymied by being part of the units in 2002- 2003 that were belted and they have been scarred mentally - dont want that to happen to our next generation -they need to win occasionally
Your proposition and mine arent necessarily mutually exclusive


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 10:15 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 5:31 pm
Posts: 351
Nick wrote:
Geezus!!

We have one group saying there's little difference in the quality of kids from 1-8 so we should win games; and then we have another saying winning means nothing and we should tank to get the best kid possible even if he isn't much different from the next!

WTF?? Maybe that's why Pagan's confused?


I think your misunderstanding what people are saying Nick.

There is not a lot of difference between a group of players at the momenmt to pick from. That might change kater on but at the moment its pretty close. So pick 1 or pick 3 is not a lot of gap.

But some on this forum want the extra pick that winning 4 games or less will bring. That would mean an extra 2nd round pick taken before everyone elses 2nd round pick. Perhaps if we qualify foir that we can argue that our draw last year was irrelevent and we should qualify for 4 wins or less 2 years in a row and therefore a 1st round priority pick.

That would mean for example pick 1 , 17 , 18.

and if we could argue the draw is irrelevent

pick 1,2,18

My point of view is that I want the kids on the list to develop as much as possible. That doesnot mean play all of them at once or play kids in the AFL who are not ready. But faced with an inform, fit physically ready kid like Jordan Russell or keeping David Teague in the seniors. Well I go with JR.

I would not play Setanta yet as his form is not there. Edwards is not ready either. Hartlett needs 4 or 5 solid games in the VFL when he is fit again. So will Bower. But Jackson should continue to play VFL and get good ground time. Raso should be looked at for some VFL. Maybe 1 more week in the VFL reserves.

No problem dropping Blackwell back down to get some confidence and bring in Carrazzo and Jordan Russell.

If that means 2 wins or 10 wins I am just trying to give younger players who have earnt there position a go. I would continue to play a couple of the blokes on the fringes if the younger blokes are not in form or there are injuries. Players like Wiggins and Sporn. But I would also try a couple in different positions as well.

I think our kids are coming along okay and dont feel it would be a disaster if we miss out on the 2nd round priority pick. I think we need to squeeze as much out of our young group this year in terms of development. So thats the VFL reserves, VFL and AFL and play them all in positions that are meaningful and develop them. Not put every single young midfielder we have in the back pocket, or to tag, or on the bench or drop them.

Nothing wrong with teaching a kid the defensive side of the game but does everyone need that grounding? No kid under 25 is allowed to play on the ball? How about play some of them on the ball and then see what there defensive side of there game is like then.

Can these players play midfield?

Carrazzo, AW, JR ?

How about we find out for the rest of the year by giving them time in there. Take Kouta, Stevens and Scotland from 90 minutes a game in the midfield and reduce it to 60 and give that 30 minutes to some youngsters to show what they have got.

Then we get a bit if an idea. We ease the load on our senior players who will run the game out better. We are harder to coach against and wear down and we start the process of development.

If that means we win 8 or 3 games I dont know. Its not tanking. Using the same 4 or 5 midfielders all the time is a slow painful ineviatble death. Might seem like your maximising your chances to win. What you get is competitive for the main for half a game and then run right over the top of when those same players can't keep up anymore.

Sound familar in this last year and a half or more?

Then we can get all these threads about how Stevens is pathetic and lets trade him. Play him less in there. Judd gets rested. Kerr starts on the bench. Adelaide are forever roatating there runners. We use the bench the least and rely on the same players over and over.

It is not working. Its narrow minded and lacking in any vision.

I want something done about it. Starting this week.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 10:15 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Frank....have to agree with the sailorman on this one..be in our interests to be finishing down the list and having first crack at Bryce Gibbs and co....we need at least two A grade potential players to give us a lift in class.
We cant compete with what we have and the days of pinching players are over especially when you dont have the dough.....Collingwood and Hawthorn both have positioned themselves for want of a better word to take advantage of previous drafts and to me its an accepted practice now and part of the landscape of rebuilding....

Essendon* will join Collingwood and Hawthorn and be the next big tankers....
Sheedy will play kids the rest of the year and use injuries, rebuilding as excuse but in reality will be lining Gibbs/Sellar etc up as Essendon* players...we would be silly if we didnt play the game as well.....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2006 10:42 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
We get a gun kid this year.. and so do eight other clubs.
And by gun i mean maybe even better than Murphy.. so we need every edge we can get.
Because right now were playing catch up .I also agree with Mojo that the time is now to see who can do what.. instead of playing it safe.
The whisper is the board has asked/told Denis to change the gameplan again... were meant to be less defensive this week.

We have a coach that the board dictates game plans to these days... I dont understannd why we dont just cut to the chase,
Also on the grapevine barring injury JK is out..

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 153 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 44 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group