Synbad wrote:
KERMIT wrote:
I'm saying that despite what many thought at the time they had no plan and were duped by the AFL.
Really clever move rushing into agreeing to that move wasn't it? We could have easily stayed at OO for longer and it would have made absolutely no difference to our position today.
Look at the way Geelong milk thier stadium. It is was just as crappy as OO but they somehow got everybody on board (gov't AFL, media, community) and they have made it work. Thier new stand is just as big a dud as the legends stand was and is. remeber the sun in the eyes of coaches last year.
Now we are told that the AFL might want to take it over as a safety net in case TD or MCG are unavailable.
Personally I have lost interest in the club but I am proud to say that I argued as hard as I could against that shit move. Others didn't.
It will all culminate in what I am predicting will be the lowest TD crowd ever rcorded this Sunday for Carlton v Port.
Won't Collo be a pround man on that day.
KERMIT i really dont understand how you can sit there and say that we were duped by Collo... We were in a position that we had to leave.
How is it a shit move???And youre proud that you fought against us leaving Optus??? You mean where we were playing in front of 22k .. the sponsors facilities were a disgrace... and we wernt making money???
you have to be kidding me!!!... you cant seriously sit there with a straight face.. and i know youre not DUMB.. and just pretend to be that daft that you actually think moving away from Optus oval was wrong???
Seriously??
You think the club should have stayed at the decaying Optus do you?
And its future was guarateed playing in front of of 22,000..and youd be happy to take your kids there .. and allow them to grow up as the Heatley Stand was falling around your feet???
Youre kidding arent you???
Seriously???
Just say youre kidding.. and that you havent been sweating so pathertically for this long to tie the move in to something as trippy as ourt current predicament so you can say "I told you so!!"
Optus is our future??... REALLY???... youre serious???... The ground that has its most modern stand that nobody wants to sit in.. staring into the sun... ??... the modern Legends stand....that everyone hated sitting in.... The Pratt stand with it antiquitated sponsors boxes.. or the Gardiner stand?? with the leaks in the roof... or the Heatley stand??...no fire exits.. built on a wood.. and about to fall over..
Thats your vision is it???
And you wanna be taken seriously????
No night games...
No parking...
No opposition supporters.. and theyre the ones that pay.. cos we have our memberships..!!
Your vision is Princes Park forever??....
REALLY?????
.............. youre not tricking are ya???.......Seriously????... Princes Park????... i mean i love it .. and everything...and first went there in the early seventies as a tiny kid... but really???,.... you looking into the future is PP????
....you dont have your fingers crossed do you???
Fancy comparing Melbournes sporting facilities and business opportunities with Geelongs... Geelong is another city you know???
Cant have a Geelong with a home ground in Melb.. and you cant abandon the city of Geelong....
.. but naaaaahhh.. i dont reckon youre serious...
Are you?????
think kermit is saying that yes we accepts that we had to leave but it could probably have been delayed a bit (perhaps an extra season or two) in order for full and proper due dilligence to be carried out and for all the facts to be conveyed to members - think there were a fair few supporters back there that accepted that we had to move but wanted a better deal to be struck - the mix of games etc.
According to the board we were supposed to receive $3mill for the move and because we have only received $2.5 mill and that is the cause of our current financial troubles. What they fail to explain is
- whether they examined the impact on the social club ($1mill+ revenue lost)
- the cost to maintain the ground (gone from $3-400k per annum at the time of move to $3mill now)
- sold the $3mill payment (now 2.5mill) as incentive to move/break ground contract with AFL to schedule matches there (ie it goes into to servicing debt) whereas the most recent reports in the media have indicated that the funds were to cover the breaking contracts with sponsors, cleaning, catering etc (ie we didnt receive any REAL $$$ to help with our bottom line).
Not to mention that had the 3mill been real cash it would have lasted under 1 season due to ground upkeep costs and loss of social club revenue
Did we really have to move then and there? Could we have negotiated a better deal/mix of games? - ie more MCG games, perhaps interstate matches at optus etc.
If the AFL were adamant at the time that a MCG home ground deal would be unacceptable I find it astounding that no one at the club has come out to criticise the AFLs backflip a few months later with the collingwood-MCG deal