I'm not on Pagan's back, but I'm watching him closely.
The Pagan issue has been a non event for me, as I've held the view that a new coach would make little difference to the on field and off field situation at Carlton. We are in it deep. Furthermore, no coach can change the list right now, nor would they be able to supplement our list next year with a first round Ruckman, FB, CHB, and 2 midfielders. Thems the rules.
But my focus on Pagan has been ignited a bit of late, as I have been left dumbfounded with some of the MC decisions, let alone the fact that I recognise that the season 2006 is over for us.
There are several issues that need addressing in the second half if I'm to put up with the hope that Pagan may do something special for the remainder of his contract.
The Digby scenario is not the only one of its kind. This is a criminal act imo. Don't create a gorilla for a short term fix and plan for the long term.
I'm not against the fringe players having a shot this year, as you never know what they might show, as is the case with the kids. But a player in the VFL must be conditioned to a game plan and a position they are expected to fill in the seniors. This would enable them to continue their development in the seniors in the same/similar position/role. ie if a player does well as a ruck rover in the VFL, and gets the call up for the seniors and ends up on the pine or in a BP, then imo they have not been given an opportunity to hone in on their craft at the next level, and help build a team. It's a waste of time. Chopping and changing creates flexibility, sure, but not when we need structure; Pagans methodology leaves a lot to be desired. The message I get from the coaching efforts thus far in the season is that there is not alignment between Mitchell and Pagan imo. No synergy. No sense of purpose. No plan. Just hit and miss.
So what have we achieved whilst trying to plug up holes? Nothing! We cannot say that we have groomed anybody for any position this year to build on for 2007. This is a must. Murphy has made his position his very own, it wasn't made for him. He's a freak. Lucky for the MC.
Rotations has been my biggest issue. It's a fast game and its bloody intense. The interchange is not a 19th and 20th man anymore, it's refuge for a breather, and gives us the opportunity to keep the intensity up. Have a look at the effort in the first half last week. I ask were the players saving themselves to avoid a second half fade out.? Well that was the result imo and what else would you expect if they are not given a breather.
The kids. Whilst I did not expect them all to play in the first half, let alone all at once, but in the second half, I expect most to have a taste, and an opportunity to develop with more time on the field if their body and heart can withstand the pressure. We need to know, but more importantly they need to know what they can and can't do and what they've got to focus on in the preseason. Something like 3 weeks on, 2 weeks off, 3 weeks on, 2 weeks off, unless they thrive at the challenge. Russell, Kennedy are a must. Hartlett is a must. Bower must get a taste.
Play them in the position they are expected to grow in. Lets start building a team.
We need a ruckman to develop, and if Aisake and Batson are to be considered, then play them on the Ants firsts and lets see what they've got to offer in terms of effort, potential and ticker.
I've never been on Pagan's back and I'm staying off Pagan's back. I understand that it's a developent year for the team and the MC. But unless I see some commonsense and development of a team for the future in the second half, I'm going to come to Melbourne and get really nasty towards them.
_________________ Everyone looks good in Navy Blue
|