Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 20, 2025 4:03 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:34 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 36002
Location: Half back flank
I agree that it was a miserable contest though.

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:47 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
CK95 wrote:
I agree that it was a miserable contest though.


the contest for "hottest raffle ticket chick in the sticks room" was more tightly contested

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Smith
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:20 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7500
Glad all you guys have come to realize what i have been telling you for years.Smith is no more than a filthy swine.
RE.......falling off his ladder.Pity he didnt live in a penthouse on top of the Rialto.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:49 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:58 pm
Posts: 3468
Location: Procyon II
I wonder who actually reads his work. Does ANYONE actually take him seriously? I don't even bother to think about him. If I want Vitriol, I would bathe in concentrated Sulphuric Acid.
Seriously, he is a Zero who thinks he actually means something. He couldn't be more wrong. People like him keep the Australian very low in peoples mind when it comes to buying a paper.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 8:00 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
beowulf wrote:
People like him keep the Australian very low in peoples mind when it comes to buying a paper.


Do people actually buy it? :shock:

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:36 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 437
Location: The Pratt Stand
The thing is if he was writing about an Essendon* or Collingwood we would all think he is a legend. He is clearly a Carlton hater who unfortuntaley for us, has the opportunity to vent his spleen in public. We should ignore him of course but we can't because we are hurt and offended by his level of vitriol and sacrcasm.

The point is he is a journalist not a supporter so is supposed to be unbiased. Clearly he is not. Somebody (i am too lazy) should make a collection of his anti-Carlton vitriol and send it to KB (who speaks to him everyday on SEN and wouldn't be afraid to grill him) or perhaps someone who is cleverer than I with computers could start a "Patrick Smith and his Poor Excuse for Journailsim" web site which could host a collection of excerpts of all his obviously biased arrticles as well his incorrect statements etc. This way he can be outed in public, just as he loves to do to us.

_________________
Number 17 - come on down!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:10 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:03 pm
Posts: 765
I have to say that I've never heard a more unpleasant man in the way he describes Carlton. He hasn't got a good thing to say. My personal viewpoint of the club is courageous in the way they are facing their demons and their responsibilities slowly but surely. Patrick Smith will eat his words.

I don't think I have heard a more unhappy man than him. I remember when describing Carlton's performance in 1995, he said the competition was weak that year

There are three Carlton haters: Patrick Smith, Mark Robinson on SEN and Dwayne Russell, although he claims he was barracking for Carlton in the game against Sydney.

Talk about kicking a team when he's down.

I can't wait for the day when we are back, financially and on field. It will be so sweet. And believe me fellow TC'ers that it will happen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:54 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21078
Location: Missing Kouta
*BUMP*

He's back with a vengeance after falling off his roof.

Robbing pool to pay Pagan makes no cents.
Quote:
AFL chief executive Andrew Demetriou announced this year that Carlton would receive a $1.5million loan on top of a $500,000 gift towards the upkeep of its home offices and oval. If any of that went in a possible Pagan payout figure - as much as $1.5m has been mentioned - then Carlton would be seen to be robbing Andrew to pay Denis. And the other 15 clubs would be entitled to be outraged.

Quote:
If Pagan's salary is between $600,000 and $750,000 it would be unlikely that he would receive the two-year payout - $1.2m to $1.5m - in full. More than likely there would be consideration for terminating the contract and the payout might be halved.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 7:25 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18083
Typical Smith article.

If, presumably, possibly........ :roll:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:14 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
How ridiculous, it is a LOAN, we have to pay it back, they didn't say, here is some money you must spend it on this or that. Don't forget Fitzy will be in the meeting tonight so the AFL will know what is going on anyway.

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:27 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
kingkerna wrote:
How ridiculous, it is a LOAN, we have to pay it back, they didn't say, here is some money you must spend it on this or that. Don't forget Fitzy will be in the meeting tonight so the AFL will know what is going on anyway.


Not if the decision is made before the meeting

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:43 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34570
Location: The Brown Wedge
I tend to agree with Fatprick - it is a rediculous position we're in. We borrow money to sack a coach we appointed 12 months ago - stupid.

The only way we could work it is if the pussies take his contract for the last 2 years and we appoint a proper coach through the correct process - not just the cheap VFL option because he reckons he can do it.

What if Mitchell takes the Bullants out in straight sets this weekend? where will everyone sit if that happens??

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:53 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18083
The Duke wrote:
I tend to agree with Fatprick - it is a rediculous position we're in. We borrow money to sack a coach we appointed 12 months ago - stupid.

The only way we could work it is if the pussies take his contract for the last 2 years and we appoint a proper coach through the correct process - not just the cheap VFL option because he reckons he can do it.

What if Mitchell takes the Bullants out in straight sets this weekend? where will everyone sit if that happens??




We pay out Pagan which is a cost to us whether he stays or goes. No doubt Elshaugh would be on good coin as well.
Have no doubt, potential coaches like Longmire, Pyke etc will accept the opportunity to show their wares as senior coaches for modest contracts.
If they have confidence in their abilities, monetary benefits will come.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:11 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
Blue Vain wrote:
Have no doubt, potential coaches like Longmire, Pyke etc will accept the opportunity to show their wares as senior coaches for modest contracts.
If they have confidence in their abilities, monetary benefits will come.


I hope so BV cause I don't think Mitchell is the right man


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:16 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Blue Vain wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I tend to agree with Fatprick - it is a rediculous position we're in. We borrow money to sack a coach we appointed 12 months ago - stupid.

The only way we could work it is if the pussies take his contract for the last 2 years and we appoint a proper coach through the correct process - not just the cheap VFL option because he reckons he can do it.

What if Mitchell takes the Bullants out in straight sets this weekend? where will everyone sit if that happens??




We pay out Pagan which is a cost to us whether he stays or goes. No doubt Elshaugh would be on good coin as well.
Have no doubt, potential coaches like Longmire, Pyke etc will accept the opportunity to show their wares as senior coaches for modest contracts.
If they have confidence in their abilities, monetary benefits will come.


Which part did I miss that said we would go to the market place for a senior coach? Will this happen?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:27 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18083
woof wrote:
Which part did I miss that said we would go to the market place for a senior coach? Will this happen?


I agree Woof. We should do so.
We have 4 weeks to make an informed decision.
There is no point in appointing Mitchell immediately. He can apply like everyone else and if he's good enough, he'll get the role.
Have no doubt, there will be potential coaches falling over themselves to coach a side with 3 top 20 picks this year.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:30 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
How exciting would it be to sack Pagan (paid out by mysterious benefactor) have Hughes manage the draft and then get a new board at the AGM and implement a 30 day process to find a suitable coach?


I'd sign up again with a smile on the dial.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:36 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
but this seems to be being driven not by the need to find a new coach but to replace Pagan with Mitchell.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:36 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8232
The Duke wrote:
I tend to agree with Fatprick - it is a rediculous position we're in. We borrow money to sack a coach we appointed 12 months ago - stupid.

The only way we could work it is if the pussies take his contract for the last 2 years and we appoint a proper coach through the correct process - not just the cheap VFL option because he reckons he can do it.

What if Mitchell takes the Bullants out in straight sets this weekend? where will everyone sit if that happens??
Wrong on both counts.

We have to pay Pagan anyway whether he coached us or not so our net loss is the payrise we give Mitchell. Membership and match day revenue will increase markedly, more than covering Pagan's payout. Remember we lost 5000 members this year, which equates probably to Pagan's payout. We can't afford to keep going as we are.You learn in life that Patrick Smith is an idiot. Knows everything but in reality, knows nothing!!

As for Mitchell, he gets the best out of the Bullants on match day. Most of the Bullants players are Carlton listed, coached by Pagan mid-week all year, as well as he time they are in the seniors.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:50 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34570
Location: The Brown Wedge
jim wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I tend to agree with Fatprick - it is a rediculous position we're in. We borrow money to sack a coach we appointed 12 months ago - stupid.

The only way we could work it is if the pussies take his contract for the last 2 years and we appoint a proper coach through the correct process - not just the cheap VFL option because he reckons he can do it.

What if Mitchell takes the Bullants out in straight sets this weekend? where will everyone sit if that happens??
Wrong on both counts.

We have to pay Pagan anyway whether he coached us or not so our net loss is the payrise we give Mitchell. Membership and match day revenue will increase markedly, more than covering Pagan's payout. Remember we lost 5000 members this year, which equates probably to Pagan's payout. We can't afford to keep going as we are.You learn in life that Patrick Smith is an idiot. Knows everything but in reality, knows nothing!!

As for Mitchell, he gets the best out of the Bullants on match day. Most of the Bullants players are Carlton listed, coached by Pagan mid-week all year, as well as he time they are in the seniors.


I think you'll find the contract SHOULD have a clause saying that if he were to get a similar job with similar conditions the contract can be taken over by another party. If we didn't write that in, we're IDIOTS!!

He can step out of the game for two years as Blighty did and watch the footy on TV from the Cairns pro shop and receive $1m per annum, if he were to have taken a coaching position with, say, Carlton he could not double dip - I think :? .

As for Mitchell - he's shown nothing but how to retain ex AFL players. Most of the quaality every week are either ex players or players who can't make the AFL team. If we had 4 18/19 yo in the best every week, I'd agree.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Meekster and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group