Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 13, 2025 1:23 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:21 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
mikkey wrote:
TheGame wrote:
AGRO wrote:
I have been critical of the board over the past few months however lets give the club some credit and say they are not negotiating his contract in public which is what they have said all along - the rest is media beat up.


The media are getting their reports from somewhere Agro. No way every single uncontracted player is going to the media, it's coming from football department/board.


No - I am convinced it comes from Brett's manager who is trying the Alison tactics.


What about Kouta, Campo, Lappin, Fisher, Whitnall etc.? It's happening with every player out of contract.

Agro I played juniors with a kid who won 3 best and fairests on the back of his old man's votes. He was in our best 6 but no way was he our number 1.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Wolfister wrote:
Synbad wrote:
If youre going to trade anyone it should be Lance 'BnF should have been All Australian CHB' Whitnall.



Image

I don't think he's gone yet... but it sucks that this kind of thing is played out in the media, and we would be stupid not to match that offer... he's definitely worth 300k for 3 years.

This article is clearly written to rile up fiesty supporters... notice how they quote the Carlton base offer, but not the Hawthorn base offer? Hmmm, if we make the discrepancy as large as possible, that'll get people talking.

The Age is just a bigger sized tabloid.



another wolfister 1 %er??? :wink:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:32 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1651
Look out the draft masters are coming. BTW that's Hawthorn. You know the club. The club that managed to STOOGE others in giving up far too much for Hay, Thompson, Rawlings(?). In fact given their track record is such that we should just hand him over for nought.

No it won't be that f***** easy for the dawks to snag him. You play hard ball. Pick 6 or no deal. Don't think about the pre season draft either - too many clubs before Hawthorn who can obtain the prized TBird.

$300k -TBird is starting to head towards the elite with that demand. Is he elite?

Parkin is a yesterday man who made yesterday decisions and has left our club in yesteryear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Parkin not a Hawthorn man. :lol:

David Parkin, 2006, "I like most other Hawthorn people were unsure about his capacity in a sense and the professional competencies he might have brought to the job and what I call his personal attributes."
http://hawthornfc.com.au/default.asp?pg ... eid=264175

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:29 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 437
Location: The Pratt Stand
Calm down gang. Talk about over-reacting.

We blame the media for printing rubbish about Carlton all year and say how pathetic and full of shit they are, then we act like they've got a hot line to T-Birds house with The Age article.

And even if it is true, we have the upper hand. T-Bird can't go anywhere unless he's traded and we have to agree to the trade. Otherwise we just re-draft him in the psd...all we'll probably miss out on is another Dylan McLaren type.

The only down side is we'll have to pay him what he wants, which is what everyone on this site is saying we should do anyway. It's win/win for Carlton, and anyone who says it's bad for club morale...please .. we're all big boys. Players and managers try to get as much as they can, clubs should try to get a good deal from their side.

One more thing, the two articles that have appeared on the Carlton web site the other day and today...the one saying Carlton won't be put off drafting Gibbs if we want to and the article today saying Carlton are keen on T-Bird are a good sign. Good positive communication from club to supporters.

Don't get me wrong i've been as criticle as anyone about the recent handling of the Pagan situation, but credit where credits due, the articles on the web site and playing hard on contracts (especially in T-Birds case where we have the upper hand) is good business.

_________________
Number 17 - come on down!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:42 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:17 am
Posts: 21
The journo who wrote that article was full of crap. The numbers quoted were ridiculous. $150K per year? Bull****!!!! How can you believe anything else he wrote when he so obviously and willfully got this wrong?

The disappointing thing about this whole saga though is the fact that we, as the bottom placed club with first pick in the PSD, are are having other clubs trying to poach our players. It should be the other way around (and hopefully is). We should be talking to out of contract players at other clubs and using our 1st pick in the PSD as leverage to get players. Play this game the Hawks are playing. Offering them a better contract and either bring them over or get their club to pay more than what they hoped to. This should not be happening to us.

I do hope the club is playing this game and it is simply that we have not heard anything in the media. The other scenario is that the board and club is so distracted at the moment they have forgotten to do this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:48 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
bluechucky wrote:
How about we put CG's comments about pick 6 and Hodge in our signatures? He seems to enjoy referring to comments by others.

:P


great idea i'd do it but i havent got enough room in my siggy (because of the difrent colours).

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18077
Jarusa wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Jarusa wrote:
David Parkin is a Hawthorn man at the moment.

Hawthorn are chasing Thornton.

Parkin said everything you would expect a Hawthorn man to say.



Really?

What is his role at Hawthorn?


I don't recall saying he had a role at Hawthorn.

Please point it out to me. 8)


True! :lol:
You're too good for me again Jars!

I knew we couldnt trust him to make an honest informed decision.
He's a hawthorn person.

Now you mention it, I also remember Denis Pagan once saying he was a North Melbourne person.
It all makes sense now hey?
He cant be trusted to be honest and care about Carlton.
Lets sack him Jars!!!!!
Well done, good idea! :wink:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:00 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Napolean wrote:
The journo who wrote that article was full of crap. The numbers quoted were ridiculous. $150K per year? Bull****!!!! How can you believe anything else he wrote when he so obviously and willfully got this wrong?

The disappointing thing about this whole saga though is the fact that we, as the bottom placed club with first pick in the PSD, are are having other clubs trying to poach our players. It should be the other way around (and hopefully is). We should be talking to out of contract players at other clubs and using our 1st pick in the PSD as leverage to get players. Play this game the Hawks are playing. Offering them a better contract and either bring them over or get their club to pay more than what they hoped to. This should not be happening to us.

I do hope the club is playing this game and it is simply that we have not heard anything in the media. The other scenario is that the board and club is so distracted at the moment they have forgotten to do this.


Base figure is 150K plus match payments - this was quoted in the article.

Selective journalism, but Thornton deserves more than that.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:07 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Blue Vain wrote:
I knew we couldnt trust him to make an honest informed decision.
He's a hawthorn person.


That's right.

David Parkin, 2006, "I, like most other Hawthorn people"
http://hawthornfc.com.au/default.asp?pg ... eid=264175

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:13 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
CarltonClem wrote:
Napolean wrote:
The journo who wrote that article was full of crap. The numbers quoted were ridiculous. $150K per year? Bull****!!!! How can you believe anything else he wrote when he so obviously and willfully got this wrong?

The disappointing thing about this whole saga though is the fact that we, as the bottom placed club with first pick in the PSD, are are having other clubs trying to poach our players. It should be the other way around (and hopefully is). We should be talking to out of contract players at other clubs and using our 1st pick in the PSD as leverage to get players. Play this game the Hawks are playing. Offering them a better contract and either bring them over or get their club to pay more than what they hoped to. This should not be happening to us.

I do hope the club is playing this game and it is simply that we have not heard anything in the media. The other scenario is that the board and club is so distracted at the moment they have forgotten to do this.


Base figure is 150K plus match payments - this was quoted in the article.

Selective journalism, but Thornton deserves more than that.


If Thornton was in a top 8 side he would have been dropped after the first few rounds this year and had to really struggle to fight his way back into the side.

He had a poor first half of the season and a good second half.

He is not worth the reported 325K Hawthorn is throwing at him.

Hawthorn might be entering 'stage 2' of their rebuilding program which involves paying over the odds for established players.

Lets see what they have to offer, we might be pleasantly surprised, if not the club signs Thornton up to a reasonable contract after trade week. Easy.

Nothing to sweat and panic about.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:58 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:17 am
Posts: 21
Agree. This article is intentionally misleading to continue the "Carlton is a rabble" story. I am doubtful the situation is as bad as it implies.

My concern is why we are not using our position to do the same. It is generally accepted we are very short in rucking stocks. Given this, I would be willing to see the club offer a bigger contract for a young up and coming ruckmen from another club who is out of contract. As Hawthorn are doing to build their perceived weakness in backmen. Are we out their in the marketplace aggressivley pursuing players that will fix some serious weaknesses on our list? I don't see it. Who have we picked up in the last few years that has been a good addition to the list? Stevens. But I wouldn't credit the board with that. Who else? I can't think of anyone. This year we have first pick of any uncontracted player who wants to leave their club. Look at the position we are in with that. We can entice a player in dispute with a good contract and say to the club either you deal with us and take what is on offer or you let him go and we get him in the PSD. Why can't we play this game? Is it because the board is not doing it? Is it because players look at our current situation and think "no way am I going to that rabble". We did nothing last year. Only had other clubs once again trying to poach our players. The trade period for this year has not even begun so the fact we haven't heard anything is not the be all and end all. But, I will be disappointed if we are simply going for the draft and not looking at poaching other players and pissing of other clubs and pressuring their cap like is being done to us (except the pressuring the cap part, we have no worries there).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 4:12 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:24 pm
Posts: 2821
Location: In The Boot Of Brendan Fevola Car
anfield wrote:
Pick 6 in this draft is worth the trade for Thornton. 2 players in the top 6 gives a 2 potential superstars. Thornton will never reach the super start heights proud, jetta, hansen, sellars, have abetter chance. Its worth the risk.

We could also pick up another Kris Massie and Luke Livingston,this is Carlton we are talking about,great high draft picks champions


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 4:46 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Jarusa wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
I knew we couldnt trust him to make an honest informed decision.
He's a hawthorn person.


That's right.

David Parkin, 2006, "I, like most other Hawthorn people"
http://hawthornfc.com.au/default.asp?pg ... eid=264175


He is also a white man and an Australian .......at the same time...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 5:34 am 
Offline
Hawthorn Supporter

Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:17 am
Posts: 13
Location: Hawthorn FC
I can't see us throwing pick 6 at you guys for him.

I rate the guy and would throw everything else (pick-wise and maybe a Young or Little) to get him, but to lose pick 6 would be against everything else we've done in this rebuild to date. There'd be nearly as much outcry at our end at losing pick six in the "super draft" as there would be at your end if you were to lose a young KPP while allegedly having a "youth policy".

You'd have to find the money and re-sign him, surely.

_________________
Father of the Tom Murphy Fan Club


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 8:37 am 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
http://carltonfc.com.au/default.asp?pg= ... eid=300771

Quick to douse speculation but yet no announcement on Eddie re-signing.

Has he re-signed or have we been given a bum steer?

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 8:41 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Just the Carlton public relations machine hard at work...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 8:47 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:07 pm
Posts: 760
Location: Noble Park, Vic
Motown wrote:
You'd have to find the money and re-sign him, surely.


Without any doubt, Thornbird is a priority ……. And don’t call us Shirly!!

It’s always an exciting period come end of season …. Management of lists, players out of contract ….. delistings …. “unwarrantedâ€


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:05 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:06 pm
Posts: 3366
I can't think of a single player that has left CFC in the past four years (Pagan's period of list management) and gone on to bigger and better things.

Massie maybe?

I might be a dreamer (but I'm not the only one), but I'm of the opinion that our football department has a bloody good eye for talent on our list. As in, whether we've squeezed the best out of our players and don't mind if they move on kind of thing

Of course the hilarious rebuttal to this is that our list has been so shit that no-one's been any good anyway - bwahahaha. That's so funny

What's not funny is the same football department is pretty rank at bringing in experienced players. Can't win 'em all, I guess

Yeah nah, if Thornton (or any other uncontracted player) leaves, it'll be with the blessing of the footy department - and I trust their assessment of our list.

Can't believe I'm saying that

_________________
"In better news for Blues fans, Jarrad Waite was not named on the club's injury list."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:34 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:51 am
Posts: 75
HTP said

Quote:
Of course the hilarious rebuttal to this is that our list has been so shit that no-one's been any good anyway - bwahahaha. That's so funny


What's so funny? Ain't that the truth of the situation we're in?

It's not who leaves...they're gone...it's who we have left.

Truth is that we had two decent picks in the draft in the 10 years before Walker was picked. One of them has left and the other is Luke Livingstone. Our list is shit for that reason.

A good side needs to be built around a core of top 20 picks. That's where the quality comes from. There'll be a few diamonds in the latter picks but from now on most of the 200 gamers will come from the top 20 in the draft.


It'll soon be our turn. Our list is shit because we've been relying on the diamonds in the rough. The quality levels will start to rise in a couple of years.

I love what Brett Thornton has done for Carlton. I hope he stays.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group