Dukes wrote:
Haven't you learnt yet dannyboy ... its ALL Pagan's fault. The board is crap, Lance is fat, etc, etc.
Don't try to argue these points with facts ... you'll get shot down mate
PS For what it's worth I fully agree with you DB. We've had the youngest list in the comp for a couple of years now and yet people still want to criticise the club for getting players in from other clubs when EVERY club does it including the likes of West Coast (Adkins from Collingwood, Armstrong from Melbourne, etc). The fact is some work, others don't ... but at least most other clubs are giving it a crack at improving their list on a year to year basis while still drafting in youth. It's easy to go down the path of 'all youth' and when the losses start racking up then blame the coach and not the policy in place. Every finals team has a mix of youth and experience ... we haven't had an experienced core since 'the traitors of 2002 and 2003' left en masse. It'll take time to build it up again and I'm one person that doesn't blame Pagan solely for where we are on the ladder.
This is why we dont have these discussions with you Dukes.
You dont have the ability to have informed debate. Instead you go with rant and rave and sprout absolute nonsense
Quote:
Haven't you learnt yet dannyboy ... its ALL Pagan's fault. The board is crap, Lance is fat, etc, etc.
This is like having a discussion with a 5 year old.
Have you got your fingers in your ears and your tongue sticking out?
For starters, this year we had more 25+ players than West Coast and the Western Bulldogs. Having more younger players didnt seem to hurt them.
We also had less or the same amount of teenagers than some finals teams.
Perhaps you should leave the rational debate to the rest of us and we'll start a Talking Nonsense section for you.

Rational debate huh??? Haven't seen that on here for a little while now. Anyone that wants to praise Lance for winning the B&F or actually enjoying winning games is labelled anti-Carlton by the tanking brigade.