Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 12, 2025 3:28 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 8:45 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 797
Location: Funky Town
Synbad wrote:
You would think Fabulous was trying to tell us that Spotlight actually create something marvelous in this country and we all benefit from it or something...and its some kind of Utopian business model.....that we can work from and learn from.... :lol:

Geeez there are alot of trippers around...


Why is it Synbad you are so pessimistic, and only see the negatives out of every situation??

Are you saying that if anyone is hired by Smorgon, they are a waste of time and only there to make up numbers?

Look im not happy either about Smorgon and Co having complete control over the board at this present time… But how do you know that the new additions will be failures if you never have even given them a chance to put forward there ideas…

Its not there fault they were invited on the board, and its not like they are exempt from the AGM in March either…

Spotlight has been a profitable business for over 20 years…why would you think a company like this, in which operates so greatly on minimising costs couldn’t help Carlton’s situation?

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:50 pm 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7562
Location: NowHere.....
Quote:
Spotlight has been a profitable business for over 20 years…why would you think a company like this, in which operates so greatly on minimising costs couldn’t help Carlton’s situation?


Maybe we can relocate the workshop er i mean HQ to china and run things from there. The board can be made up of chinamen. We can also find some quality chinese footballers who will play for next to nothing.....

I think running Spotlight, compared to a football club, might be a little different Fab.....

Lets see these new guys plans so that we can get a feel for what they are capable.

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 10:23 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Fabulous wrote:
Synbad wrote:
You would think Fabulous was trying to tell us that Spotlight actually create something marvelous in this country and we all benefit from it or something...and its some kind of Utopian business model.....that we can work from and learn from.... :lol:

Geeez there are alot of trippers around...


Why is it Synbad you are so pessimistic, and only see the negatives out of every situation??

Are you saying that if anyone is hired by Smorgon, they are a waste of time and only there to make up numbers?

Look im not happy either about Smorgon and Co having complete control over the board at this present time… But how do you know that the new additions will be failures if you never have even given them a chance to put forward there ideas…

Its not there fault they were invited on the board, and its not like they are exempt from the AGM in March either…

Spotlight has been a profitable business for over 20 years…why would you think a company like this, in which operates so greatly on minimising costs couldn’t help Carlton’s situation?


because minimising costs by importing cheap chinese stuff is not what this business is all about. its philosophy cannot be reproduced in the AFL...

Thats not to say that the guy is no good.. its just saying you CANNOT translate bringing in cheap chinese material into the country and selling it into a succesful AFL club...

and they might have been invited onto the board but are they that stupid that they took the invitation to join the Unity team and not expect to be painted with the same brush as the others ???

and were they "hired" by Smorgon to join the board???.. making up the numbers???... all they are... an increasingly desperate Smorgon wishing to pacify the Brown group... thats why they were invited on board... and yes theyre not expempt from a March lection but they certainly went on the front foot by attacking Elliot for being his fathers son.. and also DeLutis with a lie... which is he has been backed by Elliot and Lofts...

And yes theyre promising if they get elected they will bring in the dosh!!!.. what dosh????



And a lawyer in Moulton??Smorgon already has Wilson whats another lawyer going to add???... what do we want with a gaggle of lawyers when what we need is power hitters..


Theyre not power hitters.... !!!... are they???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 11:50 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 797
Location: Funky Town
Firearm Fevs wrote:

I think running Spotlight, compared to a football club, might be a little different Fab.....


Spotlight is a business as is Carlton...

If you say they are completely different businesses and there is no correlation between them, name a business that would be perfect to aid Carlton’s trouble...

I agree when you say running a football club is completely different to running any other business. But that’s why we need diverse people on the board who have different ideas but share the same goal for the future....

People say Grollo or Fahour should join the future board... but do they have experience in running a football club...

We don’t know as did Collingwood when they voted in McGuire...we must at least give people a chance to at least try to succeed before we write them off...

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:19 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:51 am
Posts: 442
Fabulous wrote:
MarkNo3 wrote:
Thanks WBY. I have as I said had the unfortunate luck to have had to deal with them over the last 61/2 years and the way they run their business is a sham. If people think the public service has a bad rep you should see these guys in inaction. They create work just for the sake of it.

One thing they would be good at would be player contract negotiations as they love to screw people but the problem is you'd probably never get an authorisation to start negotiations with them :roll:


They are such good negotiators because they have the power to do so...

Remember Spotlight is still a family business. The directors have made there money on sticking to there budget, and trying to minimise costs, but simultaneously expanding the business at the same time.... I think Carlton FC could learn a few things from them...


I agree totally.
Spotlight are the definately the business yardstick that the Mighty Carlton Football Club should model itself on.

We could slash our operating expenses by implementing a Spotlight style slash and burn on all player payments, like they did to their employees' wages under their AWA.
What was it? 2c an hour for the loss of all entitlements!!!!!! FFS! :roll:

Imagine the player exodus...........

Maybe we could also replace all club dinners (for the club sponsors) with sausage sizzles....byo cool drinks.....lower the dress standards to shirt and thongs as well so that monies previously spent on expensive suits can be donated to the reduction of the club's debt.

Yep, great idea - let's model ourselves on Spotlight and drive everyone away - players, sponsors and all. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:25 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
4everBlue wrote:
Fabulous wrote:
MarkNo3 wrote:
Thanks WBY. I have as I said had the unfortunate luck to have had to deal with them over the last 61/2 years and the way they run their business is a sham. If people think the public service has a bad rep you should see these guys in inaction. They create work just for the sake of it.

One thing they would be good at would be player contract negotiations as they love to screw people but the problem is you'd probably never get an authorisation to start negotiations with them :roll:


They are such good negotiators because they have the power to do so...

Remember Spotlight is still a family business. The directors have made there money on sticking to there budget, and trying to minimise costs, but simultaneously expanding the business at the same time.... I think Carlton FC could learn a few things from them...


I agree totally.
Spotlight are the definately the business yardstick that the Mighty Carlton Football Club should model itself on.

We could slash our operating expenses by implementing a Spotlight style slash and burn on all player payments, like they did to their employees' wages under their AWA.
What was it? 2c an hour for the loss of all entitlements!!!!!! FFS! :roll:

Imagine the player exodus...........

Maybe we could also replace all club dinners (for the club sponsors) with sausage sizzles....byo cool drinks.....lower the dress standards to shirt and thongs as well so that monies previously spent on expensive suits can be donated to the reduction of the club's debt.

Yep, great idea - let's model ourselves on Spotlight and drive everyone away - players, sponsors and all. :roll:


Move operations to China...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:56 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:51 am
Posts: 442
Synbad wrote:
4everBlue wrote:
Fabulous wrote:
MarkNo3 wrote:
Thanks WBY. I have as I said had the unfortunate luck to have had to deal with them over the last 61/2 years and the way they run their business is a sham. If people think the public service has a bad rep you should see these guys in inaction. They create work just for the sake of it.

One thing they would be good at would be player contract negotiations as they love to screw people but the problem is you'd probably never get an authorisation to start negotiations with them :roll:


They are such good negotiators because they have the power to do so...

Remember Spotlight is still a family business. The directors have made there money on sticking to there budget, and trying to minimise costs, but simultaneously expanding the business at the same time.... I think Carlton FC could learn a few things from them...


I agree totally.
Spotlight are the definately the business yardstick that the Mighty Carlton Football Club should model itself on.

We could slash our operating expenses by implementing a Spotlight style slash and burn on all player payments, like they did to their employees' wages under their AWA.
What was it? 2c an hour for the loss of all entitlements!!!!!! FFS! :roll:

Imagine the player exodus...........

Maybe we could also replace all club dinners (for the club sponsors) with sausage sizzles....byo cool drinks.....lower the dress standards to shirt and thongs as well so that monies previously spent on expensive suits can be donated to the reduction of the club's debt.

Yep, great idea - let's model ourselves on Spotlight and drive everyone away - players, sponsors and all. :roll:


Move operations to China...


So Synbad, do you think that a name change from "Carlton" Blues to the "Bejing" Blues could work??? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18761
Location: threeohfivethree
4everBlue wrote:
So Synbad, do you think that a name change from "Carlton" Blues to the "Bejing" Blues could work??? :lol:


Gang of 22?

Carlton Emperors?

Great Wall of Navy?

Navy Bruise?

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 2:32 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
Bluebagger revolution?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 2:40 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
4everBlue wrote:
Synbad wrote:
4everBlue wrote:
Fabulous wrote:
MarkNo3 wrote:
Thanks WBY. I have as I said had the unfortunate luck to have had to deal with them over the last 61/2 years and the way they run their business is a sham. If people think the public service has a bad rep you should see these guys in inaction. They create work just for the sake of it.

One thing they would be good at would be player contract negotiations as they love to screw people but the problem is you'd probably never get an authorisation to start negotiations with them :roll:


They are such good negotiators because they have the power to do so...

Remember Spotlight is still a family business. The directors have made there money on sticking to there budget, and trying to minimise costs, but simultaneously expanding the business at the same time.... I think Carlton FC could learn a few things from them...


I agree totally.
Spotlight are the definately the business yardstick that the Mighty Carlton Football Club should model itself on.

We could slash our operating expenses by implementing a Spotlight style slash and burn on all player payments, like they did to their employees' wages under their AWA.
What was it? 2c an hour for the loss of all entitlements!!!!!! FFS! :roll:

Imagine the player exodus...........

Maybe we could also replace all club dinners (for the club sponsors) with sausage sizzles....byo cool drinks.....lower the dress standards to shirt and thongs as well so that monies previously spent on expensive suits can be donated to the reduction of the club's debt.

Yep, great idea - let's model ourselves on Spotlight and drive everyone away - players, sponsors and all. :roll:


Move operations to China...


So Synbad, do you think that a name change from "Carlton" Blues to the "Bejing" Blues could work??? :lol:




Humbled as I am - I would be happy run the new Beijing Blues with the best administration that China Blue and I could offer. We of course would recruit only the best with Caz, Synners and Danny Boy as consultants with Deano running Marketing and Camel as the technical advisor.
Go Beijing Blues (what a Christmas present!!!)

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 3:07 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
4everBlue wrote:
I agree totally.
Spotlight are the definately the business yardstick that the Mighty Carlton Football Club should model itself on.

We could slash our operating expenses by implementing a Spotlight style slash and burn on all player payments, like they did to their employees' wages under their AWA.
What was it? 2c an hour for the loss of all entitlements!!!!!! FFS! :roll:

Imagine the player exodus...........


Not possible due to requirement to pay 92.5% of the salary cap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 3:38 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 797
Location: Funky Town
It’s actually funny that you guys put down new people even when you don’t have any other suggestions, on how to improve a situation.

We have added a few new board members who have been successful businessmen and just because they were invited by Smorgon they are automatically labelled “yes men" and worthless...

Is it there fault the club is a basket case…

Why cant you give them a chance before you bag them, I bet if Fraser Brown and Williams endorsed them you all would love them... (Pretty sure Brown has endorsed some of them)

I’m not a Smorgon fan but we have until March to see if they are any good and if not we vote them out simple…

And remember Spotlight is not just haberdashery, they also own RSEA and other various companies (that don’t use sweatshops) so im assuming they would have a good business development system...

And what’s with all the childish remarks "if Spotlight runs Carlton we would move to China" FFS...
What and if Grollo gets on the board we are going to start building skyscrapers for pre season training....geez grow up

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 3:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18761
Location: threeohfivethree
Fabulous wrote:
It’s actually funny that you guys put down new people even when you don’t have any other suggestions, on how to improve a situation.

We have added a few new board members who have been successful businessmen and just because they were invited by Smorgon they are automatically labelled “yes men" and worthless...

Is it there fault the club is a basket case…

Why cant you give them a chance before you bag them, I bet if Fraser Brown and Williams endorsed them you all would love them... (Pretty sure Brown has endorsed some of them)

I’m not a Smorgon fan but we have until March to see if they are any good and if not we vote them out simple…

And remember Spotlight is not just haberdashery, they also own RSEA and other various companies (that don’t use sweatshops) so im assuming they would have a good business development system...

And what’s with all the childish remarks "if Spotlight runs Carlton we would move to China" FFS...
What and if Grollo gets on the board we are going to start building skyscrapers for pre season training....geez grow up


Fabulous, you may be happy having board members appointed at the whim of the President but I want my club's board to be made up of elected officials.

If a board member retires then they should either have a by-election for that seat (too expensive) or wait until the next AGM/EGM.

If you read the bulk of the threads on the new appointees there are many who are suggesting that the new board members may be good in the long term but that they're not happy with the way they've been appointed or the reasons they've been appointed in the manner they have.

I'm not sure where the new board members' loyalties lie - Smorgon may believe they're with him and he may not and they may indeed be with him or they may not. Unfortunately that's not the point.

Incumbency is valuable and the exposure these guys get over the next few months may be worth something that isn't available to other candidates who may be more worthy. The board should have been spilled a long time ago and when this started to get out of control there should have been an EGM with all positions vacant.

As it stands what we're left with is a President running around trying to build a wall against the coming onslaught instead of opening up the process to the members and allowing the club's members to decide.

He's gonna burn.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:02 pm 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7562
Location: NowHere.....
Quote:
Firearm Fevs wrote:


I think running Spotlight, compared to a football club, might be a little different Fab.....

Fab wrote:

Spotlight is a business as is Carlton...

If you say they are completely different businesses and there is no correlation between them, name a business that would be perfect to aid Carlton’s trouble...

I agree when you say running a football club is completely different to running any other business. But that’s why we need diverse people on the board who have different ideas but share the same goal for the future....

People say Grollo or Fahour should join the future board... but do they have experience in running a football club...

We don’t know as did Collingwood when they voted in McGuire...we must at least give people a chance to at least try to succeed before we write them off...




I guess if i were to look at another buisness to aid Carlton's trouble, i would look at other sporting clubs/buisnesses.

I would begin with my ideal list of candidates who can be from any sport around the globe, and begin trying to lure them to the navy blue.....

These candidates would ofcoarse be proven to be succesful, unique, and full of drive......



I want a president like Elliot who wasn't afraid to stand up, and make the club be counted. He made the club feel untouchable in the glory days.....Ofcoarse without the financial stuff ups....

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 1:59 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:51 am
Posts: 442
GWS wrote:

Fabulous, you may be happy having board members appointed at the whim of the President but I want my club's board to be made up of elected officials.

If a board member retires then they should either have a by-election for that seat (too expensive) or wait until the next AGM/EGM.



The only way it should be.
The current lack of leadership shown by Smorgon merely shows that he is a desperate man who has been forced to take desperate measures to save his bacon.

The problem I have with that is that even if, by some miracle, Smorgon was to survive the next AGM - how long after that do you think he would last after that?

His handling of Carlton's affairs of late has shown nothing short of imcompetence.

If he survives the AGM and gets ousted before the next one, or even at the next AGM, it will only make matters worse for the club.

Someone should hand him the cushion and the sword now and get it over and done with.........


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 2:30 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
4everBlue wrote:
Fabulous wrote:
MarkNo3 wrote:
Thanks WBY. I have as I said had the unfortunate luck to have had to deal with them over the last 61/2 years and the way they run their business is a sham. If people think the public service has a bad rep you should see these guys in inaction. They create work just for the sake of it.

One thing they would be good at would be player contract negotiations as they love to screw people but the problem is you'd probably never get an authorisation to start negotiations with them :roll:


They are such good negotiators because they have the power to do so...

Remember Spotlight is still a family business. The directors have made there money on sticking to there budget, and trying to minimise costs, but simultaneously expanding the business at the same time.... I think Carlton FC could learn a few things from them...


We could slash our operating expenses by implementing a Spotlight style slash and burn on all player payments, like they did to their employees' wages under their AWA.
What was it? 2c an hour for the loss of all entitlements!!!!!! FFS! :roll:


4everBlue - I'm not entering the discussion in any way shape or form except to say - you got that 2c an hour for no entitlements from either the 'Rock The MCG' IR Rally leaflets, or the Herald Sun... anyone commenting on Spotlight's business model can only speculate - unless there is someone here who is currently on the board of directors?! :? Irrespective of their plan, you can't say they aren't successful...

As for me? I'll wait and see there there is any cash injection/sign of an improved business plan as a result of this... or *sooner yet* see if the four musketeers who have recently joined the board are still around post-elections... :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 6:19 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 797
Location: Funky Town
GWS wrote:
Fabulous, you may be happy having board members appointed at the whim of the President but I want my club's board to be made up of elected officials.

If a board member retires then they should either have a by-election for that seat (too expensive) or wait until the next AGM/EGM.

If you read the bulk of the threads on the new appointees there are many who are suggesting that the new board members may be good in the long term but that they're not happy with the way they've been appointed or the reasons they've been appointed in the manner they have.

I'm not sure where the new board members' loyalties lie - Smorgon may believe they're with him and he may not and they may indeed be with him or they may not. Unfortunately that's not the point.

Incumbency is valuable and the exposure these guys get over the next few months may be worth something that isn't available to other candidates who may be more worthy. The board should have been spilled a long time ago and when this started to get out of control there should have been an EGM with all positions vacant.

As it stands what we're left with is a President running around trying to build a wall against the coming onslaught instead of opening up the process to the members and allowing the club's members to decide.

He's gonna burn.


I agree with you there...I would have liked the new board members to be elected by the members rather than the President.

But we all see Smorgons selfishness and we know he is only looking after his own interests over Carlton’s interests.

I believe though, these new board members aren’t looking at the politics of Carlton, but are genuinely hoping to make a difference to the future of making Carlton a better club for the future...

Remember Smorgon will be gone soon anyways, and if we find out these new guys are hopeless we vote them out as well SIMPLE..

I think they deserve a chance to try a change the place

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 7:20 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 797
Location: Funky Town
Firearm Fevs wrote:

I would begin with my ideal list of candidates who can be from any sport around the globe, and begin trying to lure them to the navy blue.....

These candidates would ofcoarse be proven to be succesful, unique, and full of drive......

I want a president like Elliot who wasn't afraid to stand up, and make the club be counted. He made the club feel untouchable in the glory days.....Ofcoarse without the financial stuff ups....


F.F what sporting experience did Elliot have before joining Carlton?

Elliot was good president back in the day, but he was given the opportunity to be on the board and be president. So now we are able to say "Elliot was a good president" or "Elliot was a bad president". Regardless of what everyone thinks of him he was given the chance to lead to club and given opportunity to succeed.

If these new board members aren’t given a chance, how can we make a fair judgement on them...

Grollo and Fahour "might" be good board members but can you tell me they would have better ideas than Fried and Moultan??

We will never know unless they are given a chance...

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 7:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18077
Fabulous wrote:
I think they deserve a chance to try a change the place


These men have the opportunity to nominate for the board and to be voted in by the members like any other candidate.

They dont "deserve" anything more than that.

They are making decisions on our behalf whilst democratically elected representatives are being excluded.
How anyone can condone that is beyond me. :?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 9:47 pm 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7562
Location: NowHere.....
Quote:
Firearm Fevs wrote:


I would begin with my ideal list of candidates who can be from any sport around the globe, and begin trying to lure them to the navy blue.....

These candidates would ofcoarse be proven to be succesful, unique, and full of drive......

I want a president like Elliot who wasn't afraid to stand up, and make the club be counted. He made the club feel untouchable in the glory days.....Ofcoarse without the financial stuff ups....


F.F what sporting experience did Elliot have before joining Carlton?

Elliot was good president back in the day, but he was given the opportunity to be on the board and be president. So now we are able to say "Elliot was a good president" or "Elliot was a bad president". Regardless of what everyone thinks of him he was given the chance to lead to club and given opportunity to succeed.

If these new board members aren’t given a chance, how can we make a fair judgement on them...

Grollo and Fahour "might" be good board members but can you tell me they would have better ideas than Fried and Moultan??

We will never know unless they are given a chance...


I guess Elliots ways grew old with him so he ultimetly failed....

I see your point no doubt, all i can say is that they have to have a good track record ,and have a modern proven buisness acumen...

It would be a bonus if they are passionate about Carlton....

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crusader, Google [Bot], Traveller86 and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group