Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jul 09, 2025 4:02 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:57 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
BlueMark wrote:
Depends if the knock restricts your movement to the point where you can barely run. Campo should have missed at least a week if not two when he was originally injured as shoud have Stevens.

Just wondering have the knives been out for Fev as well because he played with an injury or is that different?


dont doubt that one bit

Stevens, Kouta, Campo and Fev all shouldnt have played this week IMO, clearly they where all carrying some type of injury and having them on the field at times during the game was almost as if we where a man down.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:31 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:31 am
Posts: 317
Location: At the Coalface.
ThePrez wrote:
BlueMark wrote:
Nothing like a good savaging to make people feel better.


Campo took a knock on his knee in the opening minutes of the game ( some of the more observant would have noted it), that agrevated his pre existing injury. Stayed on despite being encouraged to come off for treatment. He was unable to do much more than jog during the game and coud barely walk on it the next day.


like i said in another post, thats fair enough, but if all it takes for him to become useless is a knock to his knee he isnt right and shouldnt be playing.


It was reported on Sunday that he has been playing with the medial ligament damage (knee) for some time. He shouldn't be playing. He's a terribly selfish footballer to play injured, it would appear (I had a pretty good seat) that he is doing it to line his own pocket and to prove to everyone how soft he is. But let’s not make any excuses for him. He's on $900k+ a season. (Or is it up to 1.2mil?)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:41 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
Quite right he shouldn't be playing, the injury should be given time to heal and under normal circumstances it would be. But as Prez noted a number of the senior group are carrying injuries and should be rested as well. I suspect they are playing not because they are selfish but because Pagn and the MC may want/need them out there.

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:52 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:02 am
Posts: 1724
ThePrez wrote:
agree and disagree.

walker has a tag on AKA and did a great job, however, in that position, he effectively stopped T-Bird from getting to the ball, but Walker will learn from that, even in a tagging role like that, you cant afford to be total focused on your own opponent if it impedes upon your teammate getting to his own contest, but like i said, Walker will learn this as he gets more experience.



TOTALLY DISAGREE! Read my previous post about Thornton & Walker. Simply if Thornton was on Brown at the time the ball was kicked instead of 30m away he would have been infront of Walker and had a realistic chance of spoiling it was purely Thornton's fault!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:53 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:31 am
Posts: 317
Location: At the Coalface.
BlueMark wrote:
Quite right he shouldn't be playing, the injury should be given time to heal and under normal circumstances it would be. But as Prez noted a number of the senior group are carrying injuries and should be rested as well. I suspect they are playing not because they are selfish but because Pagn and the MC may want/need them out there.


We had nothing to gain by playing an injured Fev, Stevens, or even Campo. More time in the midfield for Davies, Sporn, etc would be beneficial to their development and more beneficial to the club then playing injured senior players.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:57 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
scottopee wrote:
ThePrez wrote:
agree and disagree.

walker has a tag on AKA and did a great job, however, in that position, he effectively stopped T-Bird from getting to the ball, but Walker will learn from that, even in a tagging role like that, you cant afford to be total focused on your own opponent if it impedes upon your teammate getting to his own contest, but like i said, Walker will learn this as he gets more experience.



TOTALLY DISAGREE! Read my previous post about Thornton & Walker. Simply if Thornton was on Brown at the time the ball was kicked instead of 30m away he would have been infront of Walker and had a realistic chance of spoiling it was purely Thornton's fault!


i can understand that, but Walker was in a better position to spoil and should have. He was to worried about his own opponent. T-Bird was late to the contest but the way Tex went about it he impeded on T-Bird stopping him from having any chance.

Tex will learn though - going to be a champ for us, was super impressed wtih this game, even though he made a few mistakes, as a kid i accept that, but would far prefer a kid that backs themselves (walker does) and makes mistakes than someone that doesnt back themselves and still make mistakes.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:14 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1651
Quite right BM. It was obvious Campo was restricted in movement, however there appeared to be absolutely no restriction in movement with his mouth. His antics are embarrasing and have been for years. In any case the other injury that Campo unfortunately has had to carry for years is with his heart!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:27 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:02 am
Posts: 1724
ThePrez wrote:
i can understand that, but Walker was in a better position to spoil and should have. He was to worried about his own opponent.

he impeded on T-Bird stopping him from having any chance.



You can't have it both ways. You want Walker to spoil but not get in the way? Read what you are saying!

Look I get what you are saying but if you have played the game you would know that apart from taking an uncontested mark with no opponent the easiest mark is 3rd man up. He was on a hiding to nothing. Yes he could have made a better effort but he saw Brown late after trying to get front position on Aker.
The simple fact is Thornton SHOULD have been on Brown and SHOULD NOT have given a spray to Walker when it was his fault!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:31 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1651
While we're at it, lets start to bash some other players rather than Campo solely:

Stevens - embarrassing. Beaten by a 6 game veteran in Selwood?? Did not raise a sweat in combat.
Waite - this will hurt many. Soundly beaten for mine by a rookie elevated 4 gamer in J Drummond. Jarrod looked outclassed on the night.
Houla - beaten by his own shadow emanating from the Dome's lights. Some more of those classical turnovers whether by left or right foot.
Livo - maybe a bit harsh here but D Merrett - a bloody 2 gamer pulled your pants down in that last qtr
Teague - l loved your courage last year but this year struggling big time - you are back to your best Port Melbourne VFL style circa 2003.

Could go on but will leave it here. What we are witnessing is a very dispirited group, who have no confidence in themselves nor their teammates. Bonding appears to be non existent. Pagan needs to take some responsibility here and especially whilst he is on that common Campo figure.....$650,000


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:41 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
Shakin77 wrote:
BlueMark wrote:
Quite right he shouldn't be playing, the injury should be given time to heal and under normal circumstances it would be. But as Prez noted a number of the senior group are carrying injuries and should be rested as well. I suspect they are playing not because they are selfish but because Pagn and the MC may want/need them out there.


We had nothing to gain by playing an injured Fev, Stevens, or even Campo. More time in the midfield for Davies, Sporn, etc would be beneficial to their development and more beneficial to the club then playing injured senior players.


Agree, except some in here would be bashing Campo et al for being 'soft' for not playing with injuries.

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:41 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
scottopee wrote:
ThePrez wrote:
i can understand that, but Walker was in a better position to spoil and should have. He was to worried about his own opponent.

he impeded on T-Bird stopping him from having any chance.



You can't have it both ways. You want Walker to spoil but not get in the way? Read what you are saying!

Look I get what you are saying but if you have played the game you would know that apart from taking an uncontested mark with no opponent the easiest mark is 3rd man up. He was on a hiding to nothing. Yes he could have made a better effort but he saw Brown late after trying to get front position on Aker.
The simple fact is Thornton SHOULD have been on Brown and SHOULD NOT have given a spray to Walker when it was his fault!


played the game for years - anyone that understand the game knows that sometimes it is better for you to leave your man and help your teamamte

Its a two folded problem. IMO i thought T-Bird thought that with Walker in a better position he would punch the ball and T-Bird would pull out and stop aker from doing something, but when it was clear that Walker wasnt going to do it T-Bird had to go in.

Mind you Brown came from the side of walker so i can understand you position, but maybe if he wasnt so aware of aker (which is a good thing) he would of attacked the ball first.

Its simple really, walker was in the better position to spoil or even take the mark, but he was too focused on akermanis.

Im not bagging Walker at all - just hope he will learn from it as he did during the night. He started on the wrong side of aker at the beginning of the game, but by games end he was goal side - thats great, he is learning during the game and that is all i and anyone can really ask of him.

The same thing goes for Teague IMO - you dont always have to take the mark to help your team mates. Yes its good when he backs himself in and goes against the flow of play to take a mark, but sometimes it impededs on your teammates and can be less effecitve.

they just have to learn to know when to go and when not to go - and as kids i dont expect them to know everything straight away.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:54 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20270
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
ThePrez wrote:
played the game for years


Speedy wingman Prez?

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:02 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24655
Location: Kaloyasena
Blue Bird wrote:
My question is why does Kouta get dragged in to every discussion about Campo. Apples and oranges. Kouta leads from the front and is always encouraging the younger players while busting his gut at 32 with a wonky knee. Agro I have to disagree with you - I thought Kouta was our best on Saturday. In fact apart from the Swans game he has been our most consistent player this season.


I wasn't clear in my earlier post - my criticism related to his finishing - he butchered a few kicks into our forward line which cost us goals - He was also very weak in a couple of marking contests as well being led right under the ball - I would have expected better from him normally. :wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:27 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Melbourne
This wasnt a post to bash Campo's playing ability if injured hew shouldnt play the post was his responsibility to be a VC and to lead ... The attack on Campo is more to his on - field behaviour and the way he mouths off and gives awaty poor frees not questioning his playing ability but if you want to bring that into account Campo for the weekend had 15 touches of which 7 where clangers higher than any other player including Houla

As for Stevo though season is average he still is the leading clearance player with 39 clearances so i would say has been more important than Campo for the season but yes both are prob injured but i am questioning Campo position as VC not his playing ability


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:47 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
bluehammer wrote:
ThePrez wrote:
played the game for years


Speedy wingman Prez?


be surprised mate :D

i was the rock rover - average close to 30 possesion per game if not more and would have got more if we had a better ruckmen, came third in the league one year. hold all types of records at my club :D

that was back in my leaner days when i was at my playing weight - 84kg.

yep - 177cm and 84cm - was a war tank - played my first come back game in the seconds as a 17 year old - got pole axed, went back on and fixed the prick up that got me :twisted:

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:58 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:12 pm
Posts: 1291
Location: Sydney
scottopee wrote:
The simple fact is Thornton SHOULD have been on Brown and SHOULD NOT have given a spray to Walker


I mentioned this in another thread last week. This is one part of TBird's game that really, really pisses me off. He shouldn't be doing it! Someone should have a word to him about it coz it's a terrible thing to do out on the field and it's not like this is an isolated incident.

Players make mistakes. TBird leave the sprays to Denis mate!!

_________________
When Dick became President, it was as if everyone at Carlton came out of the hailstorm and into the sunshine - Stephen Kernahan

YARRAN!!





.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
...or me....!!!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:35 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:12 pm
Posts: 1291
Location: Sydney
:lol:

That goes without saying Synbad... love your sprays... compelling reading!! :D

Just back on TBird, it is absolutely poor form to spray a teamate in front of all the players and the viewing public. This is not something that a good leader does AFAIC (and hence why I have reservations about him as potential skipper)... Especially to a young player.... should be encouraging him to do better next time instead of giving him a public barrage for a mistake....credit to AW for not dropping his head, and not losing his focus on the Aker tagging job, after copping that.

_________________
When Dick became President, it was as if everyone at Carlton came out of the hailstorm and into the sunshine - Stephen Kernahan

YARRAN!!





.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:35 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:58 am
Posts: 3583
Location: Drinking chardonnay with the elites
Bluebernz wrote:
:lol:

That goes without saying Synbad... love your sprays... compelling reading!! :D

Just back on TBird, it is absolutely poor form to spray a teamate in front of all the players and the viewing public. This is not something that a good leader does AFAIC (and hence why I have reservations about him as potential skipper)... Especially to a young player.... should be encouraging him to do better next time instead of giving him a public barrage for a mistake....credit to AW for not dropping his head, and not losing his focus on the Aker tagging job, after copping that.


Agree - while I think it stems from being genuinely angry at being beaten in a contest it is something he needs to watch.

_________________
"Whoever said you can't buy happiness forgot about puppies." - Gene Hill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: re
PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 9:17 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 11:11 am
Posts: 344
i agree that tbird shouldnt get angry at fellow players during the game - it will set a precedent and other players may follow the practice of deflecting the blame, whether justified or not. Players may also start doing it to cover their ass and to try and convince pagan at the time that it wasnt their fault. Leave it for pagan and the vidoe tape review.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group