Sydney Blue wrote:
Dont use last year as an example - when you go back and have a good look at it . It really hides the fact that we are shit and I think we were all sucked in by it.
But looking back on it the decisions that were made over the last two years in regards to playing list were totally wrong .
It seems that this year three years down the track they may do something about it.
There was no need in my mind to turf out players like Allan - Murphy - Franchina- Hulme ( I wont mention the B person) and replace them with Morrell - Scotland - Deluca - Johnson . I think it sent the wrong message to the playing group and thats why despite all of Pagans efforts the team does not respond.
I have edited your post to what I think are the ones I disagree with.
You keep harping on about how last year was an illusion. You are conveniently missing the point. Your logic isn't there:
You're saying we're sh*t and admitting we're sh*t this year. But if we were sh*t and won 10 games last year then something must have caused it. You blame other clubs. Well you can only take on each side as you find them and therefore we were not sh*t last year.
You have no explanation except other clubs letting us win in order to explain our victories last year. Essendon* and Melbourne played in the finals, Geelong were injury depleted yes, but we beat them by 9 goals. You give Pagan ZERO credit for last year, ZERO responsibility.
And yet you give Pagan almost COMPLETE responsbility for the goings on this year. C'mon, you can't have it both ways.
Secondly, your beef about Allan, Murphy, Franchina, Hulme, Beaumont and Murphy.
Fact:
1) Franchina held a contract until end of 2004 and was kept although being skills-wise inadequate. He was kept because of his loyalty to the jumper and to the coach and team.
2) The others were got rid of because they dissented against what Pagan made them do. They actively disobeyed team instructions and were poor role models for kids. Perhaps no-one has told you about what happened in rd 22 2003 Sydney. I remember telling some Carlton supporters in Sydney why we lost that day and it finally made sense to them.
Allan is not playing senior footy, and neither are Hulme or Beaumont. Murphy is skilled but you saw how soft he was at Carlton.
Until you get the idea that building a team is not just building talent but eradicating dissent within the ranks then you won't understand what Pagan has had to go through. If you were the boss and your employees were bad mouthing you in front of clients, in front of other employees etc., complaining they had to work too hard, what would you do? Any sensible manager would fire them at the termination of their contract or transfer them away. You say you've been in senior management, that's exactly what you would do isn't it? How come some didn't dissent and some did? If they all dissented you'd worry, but if Fev stays for less money when he could rightfully have looked for more at another club after kicking 63 goals in 2003 then you'd start to think, perhaps it's not the coach but individuals involved.
We were losing badly in 2003 and who was in the team? Beaumont, Allan, Murphy, Hulme.
No different to this year or last year.
And I'm going to stop arguing with you because you just simply will not accept it that Pagan had ZERO draft picks in his first year as coach (2002 draft with Black Friday) and had 1 good pick in the 2003 draft (Walker). He inherited a list that had largely been created by Parkin and Brittain. What else can the guy do with the cattle at his disposal? If the cattle at his disposal are poor then what can he do?
It seems too simple doesn't it? Well, sometimes, simple answers are the correct ones. I have yet to hear a coherent argument on why keeping Allan et al would have made this team any better.